Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Bradley Rematch: Advanced NSAC Testing Set

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by BUNGALOWS View Post
    Nah, you're a Floyd ***.

    I've seen your post history. It's a bunch of undercover slurping.
    How can you talk about anybody being a Stan when you have a pick of Pac as your avatar?

    That isn't stanish to you? Taking the time out to put 2 picks of another man on your page seems rather groupie ish don't you think?

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Golovkin View Post
      It is what it is... How many offers do you think these guys get constantly from PED suppliers? These athletes are well aware of the realities of modern sports. How are you not going to take advantage of advances in science to make sure your performance is at the highest possible level.

      And if there is a sport where athletes can easily get away with it, it is boxing. Everything is corrupted in boxing, if you expose someone in this sport then you end up exposed as well because everybody has gotten their hand inside the pot.
      I dont know man, I like to think of Bradley as one of the good guys when it comes to this stuff. He has a 1 million dollar insurance policy from USANA that he wont test positive as all his supplements are guaranteed. Now that doesnt mean that they arent pushing it right to the limits.....
      But as the old saying goes, if you aint cheating, you aint trying.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by big_james10 View Post
        What the hell do they meany by advanced testing? I guess this means that they are doing extra tests on the urine samples provide? If they were testing blood samples, there would be no need for advanced testing because all the available tests would be run anyway.
        It means NSAC will be testing for substances beyond what they normally test for, and following the rules according to WADA standard. It's both blood and urine samples. They'll be using the laboratory in Utah, rather than the UCLA one that USADA and VADA both use for their tests. Also, they'll be keeping a biological passport (which is something VADA doesn't do).

        It's a nice program. The issue is that it's being overseen by NSAC, who doesn't have the best reputation.

        Comment


        • #94
          Thread began about Manny and Bradley....now it is about Floyd and Manny???ya'll need to take a look in the mirror and get it together

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
            Thread began about Manny and Bradley....now it is about Floyd and Manny???ya'll need to take a look in the mirror and get it together
            really, of all people lol.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Fetta View Post
              So your stance change thats all i need to know
              Like I said, the commission has been catching cheaters. They have modern testing equipments now. Times change. Any testing entity that catches cheaters is acceptable. USADA just throws away samples. Where on earth would you find a testing agency tasked to prove innocence or guilt throws away evidence? Man, how much room do you need to store samples?

              Comment


              • #97
                Step in the right direction for Nevada.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
                  Thread began about Manny and Bradley....now it is about Floyd and Manny???ya'll need to take a look in the mirror and get it together
                  It wouldnt be like that if Floyd wasnt such a coward!

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    thread is fcking heated lmao **** hits the fan real quick here LOL.

                    Comment


                    • Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP