That's true. Turning down VADA and USDA before the JMM-Bradley fight is pretty su****ious.
Comments Thread For: Marquez-Alvarado: Arum, Beltran Discussing For 5/17
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Marquez vs. Alvarado - Winner gets Pacquiao/Bradley 2 winner.
Provodnikov vs. Rios - Winner gets Pacquiao/Bradley 2 loser.
The Losers of the two fights above then face each other. I suspect that we will see Alvarado/Rios 3 toward the end of the year, loser gets dropped by Top Rank as that would be 3 or 4 consecutive losses.Comment
-
Comment
-
In other words, it's Arum's way of setting up Marquez-Pacquiao V. Give Marquez a fight he SHOULD win to get him back in the winner's circle. Pray for Pacquiao to beat Bradley to make him seem like the old Pacman is back. Cash a check for a V'th fight. Eat some chips and call it a night.
Oh yeah and that Provodnikov guy. Yeah, we'll let his career marinate.Comment
-
Marquez won't fight him again ANYWAYS.In other words, it's Arum's way of setting up Marquez-Pacquiao V. Give Marquez a fight he SHOULD win to get him back in the winner's circle. Pray for Pacquiao to beat Bradley to make him seem like the old Pacman is back. Cash a check for a V'th fight. Eat some chips and call it a night.
In that case it's not about money.
He destroyed that fool... end of story.Comment
-
Only after both Bradley and JMM turned town the rematch with PAC.
JMM has a history of taking these softer fights. JMM talks about legacy and chasing a 5th division belt. In all actuality, he hasn't really earned a 4th division title.
Beating Provo would legitimize his claim as champ in 4 divisions.Comment
-
Finally a good card from TR. Like it. Alvarado a C level fighter who just lost to an ESPN staple fighter so dont see him winning but at same time i dont see ruslan wining either.
Conspiracy: arum feeds someone way down totem pole to ruslan he wins and many think hes better than he really is and gets pac in a joke of a fightComment
-
Marquez is coming off a lost in which he gave a really good account of himself against a top P4P, this is inexcusable really.Comment
Comment