Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Golovkin-Kirkland for April

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by daggum View Post
    so you think vanes was beating the best fighter at 154(ok your scorecard was terrible but thats another topic) and you don't think ouma beating vanes is meaningful?
    What I'm saying is when Vanes fought Ouma, he had done absolutely nothing in the division, which is true.

    Now what you're talking about happened several years after the fact (i.e. Vanes-Lara).

    And yes, I had Lara-Vanes fairly close. What happened was all you guys that advocated Lara almost had to eat your words and you weren't expecting that hence saying Lara was clearly winning at the time of the stoppage, when he wasn't.

    He was coming on strong and taking over the fight but Vanes won the early rounds in my book

    Comment


    • #72
      triple G knocks Kirkland out with a jab, Ishida style.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post

        Now what you're talking about happened several years after the fact (i.e. Vanes-Lara).

        This is what you're doing though. You're bringing up the Golovkin Ouma fight which is not relevant today. I don't think GGG was even with Sanchez yet at that point.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
          This is what you're doing though. You're bringing up the Golovkin Ouma fight which is not relevant today. I don't think GGG was even with Sanchez yet at that point.
          No, go back and look at my original post that started this convo about GGG-Ouma. I know GGG isn't that same and I would never bring up a fight several years ago to discredit a fighter, especially when they're more polished today.

          All I said was, I didn't know how he struggled with Ouma. That's it; I never used the Ouma fight as an indicator to how Kirk-GGG would go

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
            This is what you're doing though. You're bringing up the Golovkin Ouma fight which is not relevant today. I don't think GGG was even with Sanchez yet at that point.
            yeah, Abel was. they got stuck at the airport for a long time and other issues. triple G wasn't 100% for that fight. he's been his trainer since before whenever that fight he had in Kazikhstan.
            Last edited by shoe; 02-01-2014, 08:58 PM.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
              What I'm saying is when Vanes fought Ouma, he had done absolutely nothing in the division, which is true.

              Now what you're talking about happened several years after the fact (i.e. Vanes-Lara).

              And yes, I had Lara-Vanes fairly close. What happened was all you guys that advocated Lara almost had to eat your words and you weren't expecting that hence saying Lara was clearly winning at the time of the stoppage, when he wasn't.

              He was coming on strong and taking over the fight but Vanes won the early rounds in my book
              so vanes ****** when he fought ouma but a couple fights later he was great? the fight wasn't close. vanes won maybe 2 rounds. you must be a floyd fan. now you are pretending that lara isn't a threat so floyd wont fight him. this is so sad. guys like pac, lara, and golovking suck but guys like khan, ortiz and canelo are great? lmao!

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
                Stevens throws, and his counter-punching skills make him a more dangerous puncher than Kirkland.
                No Stevens didn't throw enough. When he did he was successful. But he shelled up for the other 85% of the fight. Good way to lose, which he did.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by daggum View Post
                  so vanes ****** when he fought ouma but a couple fights later he was great? the fight wasn't close. vanes won maybe 2 rounds. you must be a floyd fan. now you are pretending that lara isn't a threat so floyd wont fight him. this is so sad. guys like pac, lara, and golovking suck but guys like khan, ortiz and canelo are great? lmao!
                  Grow up bruh and please stop the unnecessary trolling

                  I'm actually trying to have a serious/mature conversation with adults. My bad for trying with you
                  Last edited by BoxingGenius27; 02-01-2014, 09:07 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Arguing aside, Kirkland is a beast and it will be interesting to see how GGG deals with such relentless aggression. In fact it Would be interesting to see how ANYONE deals with Kirkland. Lara, Mayweather, CaneLOL, Quillin, etc.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
                      Grow up bruh and please stop the unnecessary trolling

                      I'm actually trying to have a serious conversation with adults. My bad for trying with you
                      do you want floyd to fight lara or not. what excuses do you have to prevent the fight from happening? should he fight khan or lara?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP