Why does Bradley see himself as inferior to Mayweather?

[IronDanHamza]

It has everything to do what with your talking about..Would'int or could'int..There is a difference..If Khan was not offering the better deal,why would Bradley take it unless a complete dummy??

Bradley had a choice to fight Khan,yet it was not the smart one,as we see with his career right now..Khan is not even near the same league as Pac..So Bradley fought a much harder much tougher,more deserving fighter..Pretty simple..so your whole but he did not fight Khan statement is an irrelevant point..

Maybe in your eyes

[Rome-By-Ko]

Maybe in your eyes

I think in the eyes of most..Khan is being discussed for a fight with Mayweather..Not one serious boxing fan gives a hoot..Yourself included..

Bradley has fought better fighters then Khan period..Bradley not fighting Khan,is like Bradley turning down a fight with Brook or someone like that..No biggie,it won't be held against him(well unless you have a guy trying to hold up his agenda cough*)Khan has a lot to make up bro..Your argument is very weak here..

[Rome-By-Ko]

He doesn't see himself as inferior. Dude is just keeping it real. Mayweather fights who he wants, and Bradley needs to do what's best for him and his family and that is stay with Top Rank.

Plus talking through the media gets nothing accomplished. It killed the Pacquiao fight and got Canelo a 152 pound catchweight. Bradley is just keeping his mouth shut so he doesn't say anything that he will regret later on that will hurt him during negotiations.


If the contracts get signed, he will do his usual **** talking except unlike Floyd's other opponents, he will show up to win and go all out for 12 rounds.

You never disappoint/Thread...

[IronDanHamza]

I think in the eyes of most..Khan is being discussed for a fight with Mayweather..Not one serious boxing fan gives a hoot..Yourself included..

Bradley has fought better fighters then Khan period..Bradley not fighting Khan,is like Bradley turning down a fight with Brook or someone like that..No biggie,it won't be held against him(well unless you have a guy trying to hold up his agenda cough*)Khan has a lot to make up bro..Your argument is very weak here..

Definitely not.

But agree with the rest other than saying Bradley turning down Khan is the same as turning down Brook which of course is untrue and Khan and Bradley were the universal #1 and #2 fighters at 140 at the time and would have been one of the biggest fights in boxing at the time.

But again most of what you're saying is completely irrelevant to the point.

Either way I can't be bothered to get into this with you.

[Jack Napier]

because he is inferior to Floyd, by quite a margin

[Rome-By-Ko]

Definitely not.

But agree with the rest other than saying Bradley turning down Khan is the same as turning down Brook which of course is untrue and Khan and Bradley were the universal #1 and #2 fighters at 140 at the time and would have been one of the biggest fights in boxing at the time.

But again most of what you're saying is completely irrelevant to the point.

Either way I can't be bothered to get into this with you.

Bradley did what Khan did to him..Your point is moot cause in order to say what your saying,the whole issue must be talked about..

Which was Khan fought Mccloskey to sure up contracts,Bradley fought Casamayor to sure up contracts..Simple..Bradley fighting way better fighters also makes your statement not hold any water as well..Like you said tho,I've been tired of this topic..Then when you see where both fighters careers have went,it also seems irrelevant as well..

[-MEGA-]

Um he still was the wbc and wba Jr Middleweight Champion.....
and before him, WBC interim welterweight champion, Ring No. 3 ranked welterweight, and the WBC's mandatory challenger Robert Guerrero. Do your research. Reality and Facts hurt peoples feelings. When you blatantly lie about something that can be easily researched, you have a serious problem. One of those people that believe Floyd has no skills and somehow LUCKED into 45 Straight wins, for 17 years. Its hard for me to believe there are fans that clueless.... so im just gonna figure you for the troll group.

Sorry got a little busy yesterday and couldnt respont to this epic pwn....

Your arguments are garbage! That was my point. just like the case your trying to make now.
who did canelo beat for that WBC title? just curious.
Canelos got one good win against Trout. Thats It!

Soto Karass beat the same two people Guerrero beat. Why wasnt he ranked top 10 P4P? or even in the top 20 for that matter....

Feelings bro?? I dont catch those...

I never said one word about Floyd or what I thought of him so dont put words in my mouth or imma half ta CHOKEaMFR......

[boxingfeind]

Power = same
Speed = same
Footwork = Floyd
Activity/punch rate = Bradley
Defense = Floyd
Heart = Bradley
Stamina = Bradley
Chin = Bradley
Style = Bradley (awkward and effective against boxers)
Grit/Will/Determination = Bradley
Confidence = Floyd
Money = Floyd
Age = Bradley
Experience = Floyd
Physique/Strength = Bradley
Weight day of fight = ? (Floyd doesn't allow himself to be weighed at fight night, WHY???)

I don't really understand why Bradley would think of himself undeserving of #1P4P status if ever he beats Pac officially even without fighting Floyd.

Bradley has a better chin then Floyd?Are you trolling?Do you know how many times Bradley has been down?Floyd is better then Bradley in almost every area,whether its skills,athleticism or Resume.Bradley barely got by Marquez,while Floyd beat a younger version of Marquez easily coming off of a 2 year layoff.

Bradley knows that you people are desperately looking for someone to put above Floyd,but Bradley is not having it.He`s honest and he knows that FLoyd has the best resume in the game right now,regardless if Bradley beats Pacquiao or not.

[Grimgash]

Definitely not.

But agree with the rest other than saying Bradley turning down Khan is the same as turning down Brook which of course is untrue and Khan and Bradley were the universal #1 and #2 fighters at 140 at the time and would have been one of the biggest fights in boxing at the time.

But again most of what you're saying is completely irrelevant to the point.

Either way I can't be bothered to get into this with you.

That's the point no one pays attention to. Everyone can say Khan sucks in hindsight glasses, but at the time it was the same as Lucas v Garcia. The top two facing off against each other...and Bradley didn't want it.

[Rome-By-Ko]

That's the point no one pays attention to. Everyone can say Khan sucks in hindsight glasses, but at the time it was the same as Lucas v Garcia. The top two facing off against each other...and Bradley didn't want it.

Bradley was not signed to a promotion, he also had a better offer from a top promotion company..Khan also had fought a throw away fight to sign a three fight deal..

Tbh Bradley and Khan was a different situation then the Garcia Matts situation..