I'm impressed with Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xpert
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 240
    • 21
    • 2
    • 334

    #1

    I'm impressed with Pacquiao

    First of I wanna say, Pacquiao-haters, get the **** out of here... I'm a Mayweather fan and I think Floyd would beat Pacquiao by united decision if they ever fought, although it would be the hardest fight in his career. But credit is deserved where credit belongs.

    After the first Bradley fight, even though Pacquiao clearly won that fight, I thought Pacquiao wouldn't have the balls for a rematch, considering how Bradley was limited by injuries last time and how Pacquiao missed a lot of times when both the commentators and the crowd made us believe his punches landed.

    I thought he would just let it slip and I thought to myself: "If Pacquiao doesn't take a rematch here, then there can be only one option and that is, he's scared. **** his excuses about 'everyone saw who won', I still haven't gotten over how one of my favourite fighters, Froch, dodged a rematch with Dirrell who would obviously accept it if it was offered to him. Controversial fights needs rematches and the winner of the controversial fight is scared if it doesn't happen".

    And then, all of a sudden... Pacquiao and Bradley will fight each other again! Even as a Mayweather fan, I usually find Mayweather's demands and excuses for avoiding Pacquiao weird (especially considering how I think Mayweather would win the fight), but I'm now more convinced than ever that Mayweather is the one avoiding Pacquiao.

    Why?

    Because, by accepting a rematch with Bradley, Pacquiao has earned my respect as a warrior who is never afraid to fight the best to prove his worth. If Pacquiao beats Bradley again, then I think Pacquiao should immediately be #2 P4P in the world.

    Mayweather has still accomplished more than Pacquiao, but if Pacquiao beats Bradley directly, then Mayweather will really need to beat Pacquiao to continue to deserve his P4P #1 ranking, unless he beats Bradley too or beats Golovkin.
  • Xpert
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2014
    • 240
    • 21
    • 2
    • 334

    #2
    If anyone feels that Pacquiao has ever dodged anyone or can mention examples of when he took risky respectable fights, then please contribute with your observations.

    Comment

    • djeffectz
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Sep 2010
      • 616
      • 33
      • 0
      • 7,033

      #3
      The best fights everybody, Im not shamed to be the best, you gotta fight them all.. - Mike Tyson

      Comment

      • Grimgash
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 2625
        • 108
        • 32
        • 15,477

        #4
        No one really hates on Pacs ability or even Floyds for that matter. Most of it comes from the fanboys of each side. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone without bias actually tell you one or the other isn't an ATG.

        Comment

        • BuckToothed
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 2715
          • 300
          • 139
          • 22,872

          #5
          I thought the first Bradley fight was very meaningful fight for Pac, young undefeated top of the food chain Bradley.
          Then there was no immediate rematch, which was fine by me, even though Pac wanted him as his return fight from JMM4 KTFO.

          This is the best fight for both guys, props to Manny and Bradley here.

          Comment

          • jas
            Voice of Reason
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22531
            • 936
            • 914
            • 1,059,614

            #6
            Cool story bro...

            Comment

            • Xpert
              Banned
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 240
              • 21
              • 2
              • 334

              #7
              Originally posted by BuckToothed
              I thought the first Bradley fight was very meaningful fight for Pac, young undefeated top of the food chain Bradley.
              Then there was no immediate rematch, which was fine by me, even though Pac wanted him as his return fight from JMM4 KTFO.

              This is the best fight for both guys, props to Manny and Bradley here.
              Both Pacquiao and Bradley certainly deserves respect for taking this match! I never thought it would happen. Bring it on

              Comment

              • SthPaw
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2011
                • 1334
                • 72
                • 1
                • 10,160

                #8
                Originally posted by Grimgash
                No one really hates on Pacs ability or even Floyds for that matter. Most of it comes from the fanboys of each side. You'd be hard pressed to find anyone without bias actually tell you one or the other isn't an ATG.
                Pretty much this, man...

                Anyone who is an actual fan of the sport will tell you that both these guys are amazing. Only fanboys of either side talk ****** about their respective abilities.

                Comment

                • al-Xander
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 7412
                  • 369
                  • 122
                  • 13,790

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Xpert
                  Mayweather has still accomplished more than Pacquiao, but if Pacquiao beats Bradley directly, then Mayweather will really need to beat Pacquiao to continue to deserve his P4P #1 ranking, unless he beats Bradley too or beats Golovkin.
                  Money Mayweather had 10 fights for the last seven years
                  while Pacman had 17. A difference of seven fights.
                  That's like three bullets for Pacman, while one bullet for
                  Money Mayweather in a Russian roulette. Of course, the
                  guy who took more risks had more chances of losing.
                  What do you expect? I would agree with that if Money
                  Mayweather fought those missing seven fights and won them.
                  Nah. The guy is an established duck.

                  Comment

                  • Xpert
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 240
                    • 21
                    • 2
                    • 334

                    #10
                    Originally posted by jas
                    Cool story bro...
                    Dude, don't talk. Your P4P list is:
                    1. Mayweather
                    2. Andre Ward
                    3. Rigondeaux
                    4. Pacquaio
                    5. Danny Garcia
                    6. Timothy Bradley
                    7. Wladimir Klitschko
                    8. Juan Marquez
                    9. Erislandy Lara
                    10. Provodnikov

                    While it should really be...
                    1. Mayweather
                    2. Andre Ward
                    3. Pacquaio
                    4. Wladimir Klitschko
                    5. Timothy Bradley
                    6. Juan Marquez
                    7. Rigondeaux
                    8. Danny Garcia
                    9. Erislandy Lara
                    10. Provodnikov

                    And that's just going immediately by the 10 you chose to be on the list.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP