Manny Pacquiao Vs Timothy Bradley 2 & Undercards Master Discussion Thread

[sugarsmosley]

It is a fact that there is unfinished business, that is truly non debatable. To believe otherwise would be ridiculous as you like to put it.

Pacquiao was doing some serious damage to Marquez and was ahead in all three scorecards with the momentum going his way. It was Pacquiao's confidence and carelessness when he hurt Marquez that had him jumping straight into that punch. To say otherwise would be downright absurd. And another fact is that Pacquiao has officially won 2 fights and Marquez 1.. which he did by KO and you and I both know that it would not happen again, it was a scenario that happened due to rare circumstances.

I get that you're a Marquez fan and I get that you would rather end it that way instead of seeing Marquez get beat again.

I'll be here after Pacquiao-Marquez V to remind you of why I was right once Pacquiao absolutely destroys Marquez and goes ahead 3-1. That is if Marquez has the balls to step inside the ring with Pacquiao again for that 5th belt he claims to want.

gg and loaded both ATG posters but i gotta agree with golovkin on this one. who's to say the 5th fight isnt the greatest of them all. its all up to marquez, if he wants to give pacman one last crack, so be it. pac-jmm 5 could be 2nd biggest fight in boxing.

[The Problem Child]

gg and loaded both ATG posters but i gotta agree with golovkin on this one. who's to say the 5th fight isnt the greatest of them all. its all up to marquez, if he wants to give pacman one last crack, so be it. pac-jmm 5 could be 2nd biggest fight in boxing.

Damn right, Sugar.

But you are a 100% right. RIGHT now, one of the biggest fights that can be made MATCHUP / ENTERTAINMENT wise is Pacquiao-Marquez V. It is one of the FEW PPV fights that can guarantee VALUE and that you will get you money's worth.

I am actually starting to get excited again about Pacquiao thanks to these Marquez and Bradley fans. Here's hoping for Pacquiao to get that belt and see if Marquez truly wants that 5th title since the winner of his fight would become the MANDATORY challenger.

[KRITKL]

Dude I gave you more credit than that for being an objective fight fan, but now i'm not so sure. Asking for another fight is a red flag, and it's downright ridiculous for reasons that do not need to be explained. There is such thing as enough, and there is such thing as a great ending to a great rivalry, and that last encounter marked both. There is no reason to argue otherwise, and I wouldn't even bother explaining this to you if it weren't for the fact that you sounded level headed on NSB radio, but this is something I will never agree with you on. I pretty much don't even discuss this series sadly because of people like you who act like there is unfinished business when in fact there is not, let's move on.

Exactly, Pac already showed he's the better fighter. He has beat JMM twice already, time for new challenges.

[-MEGA-]

[IMG]http://i1031.***********.com/albums/y380/KO4132010/TimBradleyRightHand-1.gif[/IMG]

[Carpe Diem]

I still can't believe that Harold Lederman gave Bradley just one round. The whole thing was just shady especially when Harold mentioned the names of Jerry Roth and CJ Ross before the official scorecard/announcement. Don't even get me started on that ball washer, Jim Lampley. Anyone who watch that fight on mute knows that it was a 7-5 or 8-4 fight scored for Pacquiao, but these guys deceived the casual fans and had them believed that Manny only lost one round(round 10).

[KRITKL]

I still can't believe that Harold Lederman gave Bradley just one round. The whole thing was just shady especially when Harold mentioned the names of Jerry Roth and CJ Ross before the official scorecard/announcement. Don't even get me started on that ball washer, Jim Lampley. Anyone who watch that fight on mute knows that it was a 7-5 or 8-4 fight scored for Pacquiao, but these guys deceived the casual fans and had them believed that Manny only lost one round(round 10).

truth....

[DoUevenBoxBro]

I still can't believe that Harold Lederman gave Bradley just one round. The whole thing was just shady especially when Harold mentioned the names of Jerry Roth and CJ Ross before the official scorecard/announcement. Don't even get me started on that ball washer, Jim Lampley. Anyone who watch that fight on mute knows that it was a 7-5 or 8-4 fight scored for Pacquiao, but these guys deceived the casual fans and had them believed that Manny only lost one round(round 10).

But did u watched it in slow mo though? See that's where u fucked up.

[Carpe Diem]

But did u watched it in slow mo though? See that's where u fucked up.

I didn't watched it in slow mo. I just put the fight on mute and scored each and every rounds. Manny fought in spurts in most of the rounds, but he did landed the cleaner and better punches. HBO's commentators ignored Bradley's work and just discredited his punches because he, and i quote, "couldn't hurt Manny". Last time i checked, it's not about hurting your opponent, it's about outscoring/outfighting/outboxing your opponent, and Bradley did just that in the 4-5 rounds that i scored for him.

[KRITKL]

I didn't watched it in slow mo. I just put the fight on mute and scored each and every rounds. Manny fought in spurts in most of the rounds, but he did landed the cleaner and better punches. HBO's commentators ignored Bradley's work and just discredited his punches because he, and i quote, "couldn't hurt Manny". Last time i checked, it's not about hurting your opponent, it's about outscoring/outfighting/outboxing your opponent, and Bradley did just that in the 4-5 rounds that i scored for him.

solid post^^^^
that's the fight I seen as well

[Kuyukut]

without a doubt pac won the first fight. prior to the announcement of the winner, bradley's reaction tells you everything, he knew he lost the fight. i think he even mumbled to arum that he did everything but came up short.