Manny Pacquiao Vs Timothy Bradley 2 & Undercards Master Discussion Thread

[JustinFloyd]

IMO the judges did a good job in this fight..So I hope for similar judging..I think a lot of peoples perception going into the fight was if Bradley don't beat the hell out of Pac he losses..Which is not fair at all..I still don't think Bradley can beat the hell out of Pac..Pac is too good a fighter..That's not the rules tho..If you can out point ya opponent..You should win..Compubox was already proving a joke..Bradley through more punches then Pac,I believe he outpointed him..

It's not like you had wide scores all over..You had a fight in which rds were hard to score..You also had fair judging cause every close rd did not go to the Champ..There were a lot of close rds..Close rds in which at different times the judges seen a different winner of certain rds...I hold firm that the only clear rds Pac won..Were from 4-6..Outside of that,all the other rds were close..I also hold firm that rds 10-12 were clear Bradley rds..So that leaves a lot of rds open to interpretation..If you look to how the judges scored the rds it shows there was no bias from them(imo)..

I hope for fair judging,which I felt the last fight had..They did not let perception effect the way the scored the fight..They scored that fight by the rules of boxing,not what the crowd noise dictated to them,or a d1ck rider on a TV said..Bradley does not have to beat Pac up badly..He just has to out point him..Which imo he did..With an injury none the less..

i stopped there... it means your opinion is nothing but trash! lol

[Carpe Diem]

[Rome-By-Ko]

Some people are still trying hard in pretending that they believe Bradley won the first fight against pacquiao.

Hardly anyone who saw the fight believed Bradley won. Pacquiao dominated Bradley on that fight. He was consistently more aggressive and clearly out-boxed Bradley. He did most of the damage by landing more accurate power punches. That is not even an opinion but a verifiable fact.

Bradley, got a win decision he didn't deserve. An official 5 member WBO panel who are all veteran boxing judges who reviewed the fight confirmed that. An HBO poll revealed a whopping 91 percent were convinced that Pacquiao defeated Bradley.

For somebody to continuously claim that Bradley won that fight is straight up liar or delusional.

Listen carefully..Hopefully you'll learn something..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Here is another one as well..

[Jack Napier]

you always bring the laughs in Bradley threads Rome

[smoothsmg]

IMO the judges did a good job in this fight..So I hope for similar judging..I think a lot of peoples perception going into the fight was if Bradley don't beat the hell out of Pac he losses..Which is not fair at all..I still don't think Bradley can beat the hell out of Pac..Pac is too good a fighter..That's not the rules tho..If you can out point ya opponent..You should win..Compubox was already proving a joke..Bradley through more punches then Pac,I believe he outpointed him..

It's not like you had wide scores all over..You had a fight in which rds were hard to score..You also had fair judging cause every close rd did not go to the Champ..There were a lot of close rds..Close rds in which at different times the judges seen a different winner of certain rds...I hold firm that the only clear rds Pac won..Were from 4-6..Outside of that,all the other rds were close..I also hold firm that rds 10-12 were clear Bradley rds..So that leaves a lot of rds open to interpretation..If you look to how the judges scored the rds it shows there was no bias from them(imo)..

I hope for fair judging,which I felt the last fight had..They did not let perception effect the way the scored the fight..They scored that fight by the rules of boxing,not what the crowd noise dictated to them,or a d1ck rider on a TV said..Bradley does not have to beat Pac up badly..He just has to out point him..Which imo he did..With an injury none the less..

I agree with you. There were too many close rounds and Manny not being active enough led to his demise. Last time I remember watching the fight, I had it 6-5-1 for Bradley. Fighting for 30-45 seconds of each round while your opponent is touching you to the stomach and controlling range with a useless jab is no way to win rounds in my opinion.

[Rome-By-Ko]

you always bring the laughs in Bradley threads Rome

I'm happy you find it funny..Just go losing any many betting against Bradley..Try listing instead of just laughing..Don't lose ya money being the class clown..

[Rome-By-Ko]

I agree with you. There were too many close rounds and Manny not being active enough led to his demise. Last time I remember watching the fight, I had it 6-5-1 for Bradley. Fighting for 30-45 seconds of each round while your opponent is touching you to the stomach and controlling range with a useless jab is no way to win rounds in my opinion.

I agree as well..

[Jack Napier]

I'm happy you find it funny..Just go losing any many betting against Bradley..Try listing instead of just laughing..Don't lose ya money being the class clown..

huh?

[Rome-By-Ko]

huh?

Come Jack,I know your not a dense person..Everything I said in the post was self explanatory..If you can't comprehend it would make me sad for you..I know that's not the case tho..