The Predictorship Challenge: Season Four

[D4thincarnation]

I'm too damn lazy to be adding up pts. If I get robbed of points I get robbed. Lol


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Double and trebled checked your points total, it is stilling 12

[Cloud]

We never had this much activity in the last season.. or this much confusion over the points system.

[Hougigo]

Golovkin EKO

Bursak WPTS

Belaev LKO

Rees CPTS

Selby CPTS

Dunno who Beleav is...rolling with the KO ratio because I don't feel like watching tape

[D-MiZe]

Gennady Golovkin MKO
Max Bursak WPTS
Roman Belaev LKO
Gavin Rees CPTS
Lee Selby WPTS


Tempted as shit to put Rees-Buckland as a draw, I'll be putting some money on it for sure.

[BoxingGenius27]

Because the person has is 3rd on the list, not second.

.

Yea but they could be 20th on the list, but if they're in 4th place, it should read as such.

Where they are on the list is dictated by where "you" put them, not their actual standings/rankings.

For instance, let's say you're tied with several other people with 20 points which makes you be in 3rd place overall. Depending on where "you" decide to put them, they would be actually ranked #18. It just doesn't make sense to do it like that.

Rankings should reflect actual placement.

[hhs661]

Gennady Golovkin vs Osumanu Adama - EKO
Max Bursak vs Jarrod Fletcher - WPTS
Roman Belaev vs Dean Byrne - WPTS
Gavin Rees vs Gary Buckland - CPTS
Lee Selby vs Rendall Munroe - WPTS

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.

I'm too damn lazy to be adding up pts. If I get robbed of points I get robbed. Lol


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android


Double and trebled checked your points total, it is stilling 12

I wasn't too worried about it man. Although I'm trying to be as accurate as possible I'm not taking this as serious as some other people.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[D4thincarnation]

Yea but they could be 20th on the list, but if they're in 4th place, it should read as such.

Where they are on the list is dictated by where "you" put them, not their actual standings/rankings.

For instance, let's say you're tied with several other people with 20 points which makes you be in 3rd place overall. Depending on where "you" decide to put them, they would be actually ranked #18. It just doesn't make sense to do it like that.

Rankings should reflect actual placement.

If you are in the Olympics and racing in the 100m final. Three men in front of you all cross the line in exactly the same time and can't be separated. You are the 4th person to cross the line, you don't not get the sliver medal nor have you finished seconded.

You were 4th to cross the line and you have finished in 4th place.

[D4thincarnation]

I wasn't too worried about it man. Although I'm trying to be as accurate as possible I'm not taking this as serious as some other people.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Making excuses alreadly

I'm not exactly doing any extra training for this.

It a really quite simple method I use, I pick the fighter that I think that will win and choose the method that I think he will win by.

Damn now my secret is out of the bag

[D4thincarnation]

We never had this much activity in the last season.. or this much confusion over the points system.

I've adjusted the scoring system slightly since last time and made some *********s to the rules, so you will not be so harshly penalised by missing the first week.