Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cut the bull**** regarding Mayweather

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Weebler I
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by radioraheem

    What smoke? Gossip? There is no smoke. USADA published his results and his opponents results way before the rumor came out. With detailed dates of when him and his opponents were tested. In true journalism, rumor has no place in a story. But in amateur journalism, rumor has a home laced in diamonds.

    Thomas Hauser is not an amateur tho.

    Quote:

    "On May 20, 2012, a rumor filtered through the drug-testing community that Mayweather had tested positive on three occasions for an illegal performance-enhancing drug.

    More specifically, it was rumored that Mayweather’s “A” sample had tested positive on three occasions and, after each positive test, USADA had found exceptional circumstances in the form of inadvertent use and gave Floyd a waiver. This waiver, according to the rumor, negated the need for a test of Floyd’s “B” sample. And because the “B” sample was never tested, a loophole in USADA’s contract with Mayweather and Golden Boy allowed the testing to proceed without the positive “A” sample results being reported to Mayweather’s opponent or the Nevada State Athletic Commission (which had jurisdiction over the fights).

    In late-May, Pacquiao’s attorneys heard the rumor. On June 4, 2012, they served document demands and subpoenas on Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions, Golden Boy and USADA calling for the production of all documents that related to PED testing of Mayweather for the Shane Mosley, Victor Ortiz and Miguel Cotto fights.

    The documents were not produced. There was a delay in the proceedings while Floyd spent nine weeks in the Clark County Detention Center after pleading guilty to charges of domestic violence and harassment. Upon his release from jail on August 2nd, settlement talks heated up.

    On September 25, 2012, a stipulation of settlement ending the defamation case was filed with the court. The parties agreed that the terms of settlement would be kept confidential. Prior to the agreement being signed, two sources with detailed knowledge of the proceedings told this writer that Mayweather’s initial monetary settlement offer was “substantially more” than Pacquiao’s attorneys had expected it would be and an agreement in principle was reached soon afterward.

    I don’t know if Floyd Mayweather or Manny Pacquiao has used performance-enhancing drugs or not.

    I do know that, if Mayweather’s “A” sample tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug on one or more occasions and he was given a waiver by USADA that concealed this fact from the Nevada State Athletic Commission, his opponent and the public, we have an ingredient that could contribute to the making of a scandal."
    Hell on earth fire!!!



    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
      Who knows if he did or didn't, but sure lots of smoke coming from that direction
      Not really, one article that no one else certified, with no semblance of fact, and the word "Rumor" spread throughout it and literally no one, not even Pac mentioning it. There's more circumstantial evidence of Pac juicing than Floyd. Neither hold any weight but when looking at the facts in front of you that's how it looks.

      Comment


      • #53
        USDA covered for the little bitter black boxer but exposed a global icon, hero in Lance Armstrong. GTFOH!! Mayweather nor Pack have ever tested positive. Time to move on to something different.

        Comment


        • #54
          I'm sorry, I don't know the Lance Armstrong story. I saw him on TV just months ago admitting his guilt. But here are people crediting USADA for exposing the bike racer. I'm confused. Wasn't he tested positive by USADA?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by emurgencee View Post
            He NEVER had a positive blood or urine test

            neither did Shane Mosley

            Comment


            • #56
              Is this in response to the Roach interview?

              And some mention theres smoke in a rumor but actual fact there isnt

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Grimgash View Post
                Not really, one article that no one else certified, with no semblance of fact, and the word "Rumor" spread throughout it and literally no one, not even Pac mentioning it. There's more circumstantial evidence of Pac juicing than Floyd. Neither hold any weight but when looking at the facts in front of you that's how it looks.
                Oh there's smoke, only question is if there's fire:

                Derek (Tampa)

                What do you make of that article that goes out of its way to implicate Floyd Mayweather as a PED user without actually saying it?
                Dan Rafael (12:13 PM)

                That has been the rumor for a long time but I need to see proof before I accuse somebody of something so serious. What is fact, however, is that the settlement in the Pacquiao/Mayweather lawsuit happened after the Pacquiao camp tried to get Mayweather's USADA testing records. So maybe where there is smoke there is fire.
                Then you get a whiff of TMT fighters testing dirty, USADA's sketchy track record in boxing, and this bit of comedy:

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Fetta View Post
                  Is this in response to the Roach interview?

                  And some mention theres smoke in a rumor but actual fact there isnt
                  Where there's smoke there's butt hurt. Hehe...

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by JQside View Post
                    I'm sorry, I don't know the Lance Armstrong story. I saw him on TV just months ago admitting his guilt. But here are people crediting USADA for exposing the bike racer. I'm confused. Wasn't he tested positive by USADA?
                    Lance Armstrong tested negative 95% of the time when he tested with USADA and other agencies (such as overseas in Europe). This was at a time, the testers weren't as advanced. So he beat the tests, and whenever he got caught which was few, he would do things like get out of it by having fabricated prescriptions from doctors. USADA had been after Armstrong for years and finally was able to gather up a case against him that he couldn't evade. Witnesses, re-testing his samples from past years, etc.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
                      Lance Armstrong tested negative 95% of the time when he tested with USADA and other agencies (such as overseas in Europe). This was at a time, the testers weren't as advanced. So he beat the tests, and whenever he got caught which was few, he would do things like get out of it by having fabricated prescriptions from doctors. USADA had been after Armstrong for years and finally was able to gather up a case against him that he couldn't evade. Witnesses, re-testing his samples from past years, etc.
                      Sounds pretty ineffective. But was he contracting them to go after his a$$? Didn't think so, and that's where the Lance argument fails.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP