Why the double standard: Mayweather and Rigondeaux?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigg Rigg
    The People's Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2013
    • 11387
    • 280
    • 58
    • 20,735

    #41
    No difference to me between the two. I can appreciate their styles even though it's not that entertaining. Wards excessive clinching though is hella boring IMO.

    Comment

    • BUNGALOWS
      undisputed champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 6331
      • 326
      • 154
      • 7,018

      #42
      You all know I hate me some Floyd, but I WAS a fan of his for a long time. He did have some great fights.

      Rigo is just plain old, boring as hell.

      Comment

      • Queen_Leia
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2004
        • 4256
        • 312
        • 487
        • 30,245

        #43
        Originally posted by BUNGALOWS
        You all know I hate me some Floyd, but I WAS a fan of his for a long time. He did have some great fights.

        Rigo is just plain old, boring as hell.
        Wow...I never though i read a statement like that from you Bunghole....impressive, most impressive.

        Comment

        • Queen_Leia
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2004
          • 4256
          • 312
          • 487
          • 30,245

          #44
          At least Mayweather tries to go for the KO like in the Ortiz fight. If you put Rigo in that situation, I don't think he would even try for the sucker punch.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP