Why not Gamboa- Broner at 140?
Collapse
-
-
why not at 135??? oh yeah Broner is a fat piece of **** he ducked the champs at 35 fought Rees and demarco lmaoComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Nice stats. Yeah, I've always said Gamboa is too small for 140. Even 135 is pushing it.Gamboa is not a huge small guy. He is bloated, but when we are talking about size, it always boils down to reach. Lets have a look at the reach of competitive fighters at 140lb.
Gamboa... 65"
Broner... 70"
Marquez... 69"
Bradley... 69"
Maidana... 69"
Garcia 68.5"
Mattyse 69"
Morales 72"
Now lets compare Gamboa with fighters of a size similar to him.
Darchinyan... 64 1/2"
Mares... 66"
Salido... 67"
Arce... 66"
Vazquez Jr... 66"
Historically, the biggest factor in how far up in weight a fighter can successfully move has been his reach. Fighters start to look bad and falter when they start to face fighters who have a larger and larger reach advantage on them.
Gamboa is tiny. He shouldn't even be at 135, much less 140.Comment
-
Why not Gamboa vs Pacquiao 140?
Talk about undeserving people getting fights I think Pacquiao is just trying to compete with mayweather to see who pics the ****tiest oponent if Floyd picks Khan and Pacquiao by some weird miracle fights Gamboa I call it a draw.Comment
-
Comment
-
Mainly because Broner wants to try to win back his title from Maidana and it's a done deal. After Maidana kicks his ass again the Gamboa fight would be interesting but Gamboa does not fight for Golden Boy as far as I know so the fight probably would not happen.Comment
-
I don't know why they don't make the Bradley-Pacquiao fight. That seems like a good 50-50 fight that would put Pacquiao right back near the top if he can win it. Pacquiao would KO Gamboa in my opinion but it would do nothing for him anymore than beating Khan will do anything for Mayweather except make him richer of course.Comment
-
If it happened i wouldn't complain....
Would rather see Gamboa vs Vasquez burns/Crawford, FigueroaComment
Comment