Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Holyfield in Hot Water After Anti-Gay Jab on Big Brother

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View Post
    This is typical Southern Baptist thinking...imagine having to vote against this type of rationale in every national election. There is a reason all the most educated states are blue and the least educated ones are red.
    Is that why the economy is in the worst condition it has been in since 2008? That's the dumb redneck **********'s fault right? Either way man, there is a reason why the government doesn't subject themselves to the stuff they subject us to...even they know it's crap. Great to have an opinion but don't be naive.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Michael Paine View Post
      I didn't change the subject and you destroyed nothing, the subject is about ***ual preference. You want me to answer a question that nobody has a definitive answer to, I asked you the question back because if that is proof gays are born gay then *****philes must be also.
      We were talking about *******uality, and you brought up *****philia. That's a subject change, and it was brought on by me destroying your nonsense. Pretty simple.

      Keep digging, Junior.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by takingaim View Post
        We were talking about *******uality, and you brought up *****philia. That's a subject change, and it was brought on by me destroying your nonsense. Pretty simple.

        Keep digging, Junior.
        We were discussing how influences being raised can affect what people find ***ually attractive, how did you destroy my nonsense? You asked a question that you know there's no right answer to, that's why you can't answer when it got flipped back. If you believe gays are born because "why would they choose to be gay", then you must apply the same logic to *****philes.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Michael Paine View Post
          We were discussing how influences being raised can affect what people find ***ually attractive, how did you destroy my nonsense? You asked a question that you know there's no right answer to, that's why you can't answer when it got flipped back. If you believe gays are born because why would they choose to be gay, then you must apply the same logic to *****philes.
          We were discussing *******uality and you brought up *****philia. I made one particular point which you had absolutely no response to, so in your desperation, you brought up *****philia.

          Also, even if *****philes are born that way, it doesn't make sense for you to bring them up in this discussion, because *****philes are predators (they prey on weak/vulnerable). *******uals are not. *******uals engage in ***ual activities with CONSENTING ADULTS of the same ***.

          You have no argument. You're done.

          Comment


          • #85
            Ironic though aint it? Think how rich the bastard maker would be if he swung the other way? Maybe he is just envious! :bukkake:

            Comment


            • #86
              So Floyd is handicapped atleast according to evander.

              Comment


              • #87
                Why do I get the feeling that this thread will reach Floyd Mayweather/Pacquiao page territory, with NSB's cream of the crop sharing their socio-political views, showing us why some of them are such ******s when it comes to Boxing opinions in the first place.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by takingaim View Post
                  We were discussing *******uality and you brought up *****philia. I made one particular point which you had absolutely no response to, so in your desperation, you brought up *****philia.

                  Also, even if *****philes are born that way, it doesn't make sense for you to bring them up in this discussion, because *****philes are predators. *******uals are not. *******uals engage in ***ual activities with CONSENTING ADULTS of the same ***.

                  You have no argument. You're done.
                  Your whole argument is "why would they choose to be gay", why does anyone choose to be/do anything society frowns upon? Your argument is ******, gay people hang on to "gays are born" because society are more accepting if it's something people are born with and can't change. Men in ancient Greece were almost all bi-***ual, were they born that way and it suddenly changed and people stopped being born to like ****? No society and influences changed and so did peoples ***ual preferences.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    There's nothing wrong with what Holyfield said gays always get so offended when u don't agree with them and say your a hateful person that's holyfields opinion and he doesn't agree with gays. Being *******ual is wrong it's not normal a man and a man can't reproduce neither can a women and a women so that right there lets me know it's not normal it's a sin but people these days call the bad good and the good bad. I don't hate gays i respect them as human being but I don't agree with what they do and they need Jesus. Sick people go to the doctors and sinners can go to Jesus I think that's what Holyfield meant.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Michael Paine View Post
                      Your whole argument is "why would they choose to be gay", why does anyone choose to be/do anything society frowns upon?
                      Misrepresentation of my argument. But I expect that from someone who is so obviously in a hole & just cannot help but keep digging.

                      I didn't simply say 'why would someone choose to be gay'. I said, 'why would someone choose to be gay IN A COUNTRY LIKE SAUDI ARABIA'. If you weren't aware, *******uals are given the death penalty in SA. *******uality is not a part of any aspect of society in a country like that & Islam reigns supreme, so your upbringing argument ("I believe how/where/who/what they experience while being raised affects what a person finds ***ually attractive") falls flat on its face.

                      And I return to my point that drove you to try and change the subject - two brothers, exact same upbringing, one is straight, one is gay... explain that one to me. Can you do that?

                      Originally posted by Michael Paine View Post
                      Your argument is ******, gay people hang on to "gays are born" because society are more accepting if it's something people are born with and can't change.


                      No dummy, it's because there's actual reasons which suggest they're born that way, and you keep ignoring them (so desperate, you try and change the subject to *****philia).

                      Please explain to me why if upbringing effects which *** a person will grow up to be ***ually attracted to, why is one brother gay & one straight, yet they have the exact same upbringing, and why are there gay people in the most anti-gay countries on the planet, such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Uganda, Iran etc etc

                      Originally posted by Michael Paine View Post
                      Men in ancient Greece were almost all bi-***ual, were they born that way and it suddenly changed and people stopped being born to like ****?
                      Where is your evidence that "almost all men" in ancient Greece were bi-***ual?

                      Originally posted by Michael Paine View Post
                      No society and influences changed and so did peoples ***ual preferences.
                      I've just destroyed this nonsense, and yet you persist. lol

                      Your destruction continues. This is fun.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP