I mean lets be fair he arguably lost to a vastly inferior version in Trout who had a broken foot/ankle.
Everyone knew it, they just bit their tongue and justified the bull**** because they was more transfixed with Floyd vs Canelo.
Lara embarrasses him in cruel fashion. Its not even a fight, #1 & #2 or not, Canelo is no challenge. Its a mistmatch.
I haven't seen much of Lara but there seems to be lots of hype around him, really favouring him over many fighters and rendering him almost unbeatable at 154. As such, if he is so favoured over Canelo, in your opinions how much more dangerous would Lara have been to Floyd instead of Canelo in their fight?
I haven't seen much of Lara but there seems to be lots of hype around him, really favouring him over many fighters and rendering him almost unbeatable at 154. As such, if he is so favoured over Canelo, in your opinions how much more dangerous would Lara have been to Floyd instead of Canelo in their fight?
Lara is a one dimenstional hype job. He's a great counter puncher and that's about it. His two best wins are against unskilled bum pressure fighters. One against Trout who is average at best. Two was a robbery against Trouts twin Paul Williams. He completely stunk up the joint and completely ruined a perfectly good Saturday evening against Vanes. I was done with Lara after that fight. If I never see him fight again it would be too soon.
Lara is a one dimenstional hype job. He's a great counter puncher and that's about it. His two best wins are against unskilled bum pressure fighters. One against Trout who is average at best. Two was a robbery against Trouts twin Paul Williams. He completely stunk up the joint and completely ruined a perfectly good Saturday evening against Vanes. I was done with Lara after that fight. If I never see him fight again it would be too soon.
Lara is a one dimensional hype job but he is also a counter puncher. Interesting.
Comment