But the problem with your previous post is, you used Manny as a means to build the Bradley fight up even more.
Paraphrasing, but you said, "if Manny does better against Prov than Bradley, it builds the fight up even more." Something along those lines.
#1. Pac is Pac, no need to build up anything.
#2. Bradley only slugged it out with Prov to prove the doubters wrong, and prove something to himself. 9/10 times, he outboxes the breaks off of Prov.
#3. He just beat JMM. Just got enough exposure, where we don't have to go through 2 fights, to see the one that really means something.
#4. No need to sell this fight. It sells itself.
Paraphrasing, but you said, "if Manny does better against Prov than Bradley, it builds the fight up even more." Something along those lines.
#1. Pac is Pac, no need to build up anything.
#2. Bradley only slugged it out with Prov to prove the doubters wrong, and prove something to himself. 9/10 times, he outboxes the breaks off of Prov.
#3. He just beat JMM. Just got enough exposure, where we don't have to go through 2 fights, to see the one that really means something.
#4. No need to sell this fight. It sells itself.
Comment