Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why does Maidana deserve a fight against Floyd over Khan?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
    I din't realize when a fighter moves up they're still considered the weight they originally moved up from. When did that happen??
    Didn't you just ask me what weight Molina competed at?

    But thanks for clearing up my point.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
      So since Khan got stopped at lightweight he's a lightweight correct??
      No, but according to you Molina was a lightweight.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
        Didn't you just ask me what weight Molina competed at?

        But thanks for clearing up my point.
        Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
        So since Khan got stopped at lightweight he's a lightweight correct??
        .............................................

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
          No, but according to you Molina was a lightweight.
          What weight is he now??

          Comment


          • #35
            Why does Khan deserve a fight against Floyd over Maidana?

            Comment


            • #36
              For one, Khan ain't the same if you can't see that then there isn't any convincing you. Second, Maidana is coming off of a winning streak, where as Khan has been looking shitty and would more than likely get stopped by Maidana if they rematch now. I don't like either fights but it's obvious who's more deserving.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                Most posters on NSB knew what Broner was - an overhyped lightweight. Especially after his performance vs Malignaggi. Broner is a good fighter, but he's flatfooted and he's most certainly not a WW. It's easier to throw 1000 punches vs a stationary target that Broner is. Khan also throws between 700-900 punches in most of his 12 round fights - it doesn't really mean anything when it comes to landing on a much more elusive target in a Floyd Mayweather.
                Lets be honest, "Most posters on NSB knew what Broner was - an overhyped lightweight" is pure BS and you know it. Some of us saw him as unproven hype but it wasnt most of us. Lots of avatars changed in shame after that fight.
                99 out of 100 boxing experts had Broner winning, some by a bigger margin others by less, but everyone thought he had this (I thought Broner was hype but I had him winning this one) , and many that are now hiding under a rock thought he was the future king of boxing in spite of the SD against Paulie and a couple more fights that he could heave lost had it not been for the known boxing politics.
                He is most def. a WW, the exact same hight as Maidana, 5.7, made the weight too so that's that. You could make a case for a 5.4 guy like Rees being to small, but not for Broner. Broner was huge for the lighter weight in which he felt comfortable, bullying smaller guys.
                About the number of punches, its both the number and power that goes along with them.
                If there's one thing you can say for Broner is that he took a beating that would have left most other boxers sleeping on the canvas.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  .............................................
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  Khan dominated Diaz?? Ok. And who is Molina again and what weight class does he compete??
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  What weight is he now??
                  What weight was he when he fought Khan?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                    What weight was he when he fought Khan?
                    What weight class is he at now??

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by FerFAL View Post
                      Lets be honest, "Most posters on NSB knew what Broner was - an overhyped lightweight" is pure BS and you know it. Some of us saw him as unproven hype but it wasnt most of us. Lots of avatars changed in shame after that fight.
                      99 out of 100 boxing experts had Broner winning, some by a bigger margin others by less, but everyone thought he had this (I thought Broner was hype but I had him winning this one) , and many that are now hiding under a rock thought he was the future king of boxing in spite of the SD against Paulie and a couple more fights that he could heave lost had it not been for the known boxing politics.
                      He is most def. a WW, the exact same hight as Maidana, 5.7, made the weight too so that's that. You could make a case for a 5.4 guy like Rees being to small, but not for Broner. Broner was huge for the lighter weight in which he felt comfortable, bullying smaller guys.
                      About the number of punches, its both the number and power that goes along with them.
                      If there's one thing you can say for Broner is that he took a beating that would have left most other boxers sleeping on the canvas.
                      It's most certainly not bs.

                      We can easily find some of the threads post the PM fight.
                      He's a fantastic lightweight. He really is, but he's not a WW.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP