Comments Thread For: Mayweather Hints He'll Face Khan or Maidana on May 3

[WESS]

You can be on the yesterday today thing all you want. Doesn't change Floyd-Maidana/Khan as terrible fights. Doesn't change it one bit. Do you believe Maidana has a chance?? How good of one. How can someone who doesn't believe in belts use that as the excuse a $h!ty fight gets made??

I did say pressure can beat Floyd. I never said Maidana could. explain to me how Maidana's "pressure" affects Floyd.




Why does Floyd have to fight at 147?

He doesn't have to if that's what you think i'm implying. However it's his current best weight class where he looks his best and fights his best.

[al-Xander]

Mayweather Hints He'll Face Khan or Maidana on May 3

Riight. Thurman and Lara are out of the picture.
They're too big and slick for Floyd da best.
The best fighting the best. What a joke.

[Bushbaby]

He doesn't have to if that's what you think i'm implying. However it's his current best weight class where he looks his best and fights his best.

Or perhaps it's the guys he's fighting..........

[COVID-19]

It will be Maidana, after beating his son, Mayweather will want revenge.

[WESS]

Or perhaps it's the guys he's fighting..........

Or simply the fact that Floyd looks his best at WW because he's a WW regardless of who is or isn't there. It's also the very same weight class where the two biggest (Bradley/Pac) fights that can be made are at.

Doesn't change the fact that a Lara fight should happen though.

[IronDanHamza]

You take about lies. Find where I said Thurman has fought anyone in Floyd's league please. You do a fine job of making $h!t up yourself.

No but you've said Floyd should fight Thurman, have you not?

And that it's a fight you think Thurman could win.

So you think that, yet he hasn't fought anyone in his league? The same thing you're doing to discredit Maidana? Which one is it?

Or I suppose Thurman was a "lie" aswell? Or was that one the truth? I suppose it depends on what day you make the statement

[Bushbaby]

No but you've said Floyd should fight Thurman, have you not?

And that it's a fight you think Thurman could win.

So you think that, yet he hasn't fought anyone in his league? The same thing you're doing to discredit Maidana? Which one is it?

Or I suppose Thurman was a "lie" aswell? Or was that one the truth? I suppose it depends on what day you make the statement

Nope coming in here acting like i said Thurman beat fighters in Floyd's league or whatever is your lie. I said nothing remotely close. In fact you'll never find anything like that.

Another lie you are telling is that I'm discrediting Maidana. I also never did any such thing. It's 1 thing to say people are lying, while turning around and doing the same.

[junior gong]

Weak sauce. Why doesnt this bender just man the **** up and fight Manny? Oh, yeah....because of his million excuses.

[IronDanHamza]

Nope coming in here acting like i said Thurman beat fighters in Floyd's league or whatever is your lie. I said nothing remotely close. In fact you'll never find anything like that.

Another lie you are telling is that I'm discrediting Maidana. I also never did any such thing. It's 1 thing to say people are lying, while turning around and doing the same.

No but you've said that Thurman is a good fight for Mayweather then said Maidana isn't because he's not beat anyone in Floyds league. So again, which one is it?

How are you not discrediting Maidana? You're saying it's a cherry pick so that's entirely what you're doing.

I didn't say you were lieng YOU said you were lieing!

I haven't called you a liar once. You are the one who's called yourself a liar. Or at least that's your absolutely pathetic reasoning as to why picked certain fighters to beat Floyd.

"Oh I was lieing then. I'm not now though"

[Bushbaby]

No but you've said that Thurman is a good fight for Mayweather then said Maidana isn't because he's not beat anyone in Floyds league. So again, which one is it?

How are you not discrediting Maidana? You're saying it's a cherry pick so that's entirely what you're doing.

I didn't say you were lieng YOU said you were lieing!

I haven't called you a liar once. You are the one who's called yourself a liar. Or at least that's your absolutely pathetic reasoning as to why picked certain fighters to beat Floyd.

"Oh I was lieing then. I'm not now though"

Never said that. And I'm discrediting Maidana because he's a cherrypick he's not the guy cherrypicking. And yes, I said Thurman is a good fight for Floyd. I never said however he beat Floyd level opponents like you claimed, that is a lie. It's also a lie to say I'm discrediting Maidana. Which I'm not. Up to now you haven't given any explanation of what Maidana will do to bother Floyd.

Maidana is an exciting fighter. He's earned his strap, he's fun to watch. But he will get beaten pretty easily by Floyd. I know that's the type of opponent you Floyd fans like. Guys that don't have a prayer, "but put together a lil run for himself". As I've said you and I know Maidana has no chance.