Would you rather be tall with long reach or short with long reach?

[MODAPHUKA]

Like , below the waist?

[Mike D]

[IMG]http://gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Old-****e-Guy-Head-Nod.gif[/IMG]

[AlexKid]

Short & long reach.

Why would you prefer this?

[Jack Napier]

as a fighter, why would you ever want to be short?

[AlexKid]

as a fighter, why would you ever want to be short?

Hitting down on the top of someone's head sucks. (So helps prevent a KO)

A short body is much harder to KO too since its much easier to thicken the muscle of the midsection. So good defense there again.

There are plenty more.

[Prince Mongo]

When I think short with long reach I think of Marvin Hagler. With a tall fighter a shorter guy has the advantage at close range when he has got under them and inside but that is not going to happen with a shorter guy. Short with long reach is going to be tougher for a shorter fighter to take on than tall and long reach because he is not going to have it so easy once he gets inside.