Pacquiao: ‘No way at 132 lbs.’

[Mr. Ryan]

You talk about ownage and **** but you seem to forget that these two are 1-1 on their bouts. Both won their respective fights convincingly, so I don't know where is the "ownage"

When Morales is looking up at the stars, he is indeed owned. It was a brutal and ruthless end for a legend. Boxing is a cruel sport. Emmanuel Steward said that after the 6th round, he knew Morales was gonna quit. Thats owned.

[hollister]

Actually, you're not doing the math. Simple arithmetic and cannot understand? lol!

Well, let me school you on basic arithmetic kid.

Before round 10 I had pac ahead by 1 point. 86-85.

Now add the 2 KD's to the equation then it would be a 10-7 round

Equals 96- 92 for PAC.

Add also the 2 more PAC round in 11 and 12 as clearly even if Morales survives that round, he's not gonna win anymore rounds as he's shot already, no more legs, no more balance, no more nothing.

Add that up and you will have a

116-110 for PAC and that is already the most conservative calculation.

err... 116-110 isn't a competetive fight in my eyes. It's a beating.

I guess you didn't read the post, right?
His score was going into the 10th round,
not at the end of the 10th round, or including
rounds that never occurred.

[dep_violator]

I guess you didn't read the post, right?
His score was going into the 10th round,
not at the end of the 10th round, or including
rounds that never occurred.

And I guess you're not seeing his point. His point is, I'll explain it for your convinience, is that the second fight was not a blowout but competetive.

I just gave him evidence why the fight isn't competetive but a bad beating.

[morancito]

Actually, you're not doing the math. Simple arithmetic and cannot understand? lol!

Well, let me school you on basic arithmetic kid.

Before round 10 I had pac ahead by 1 point. 86-85.

Now add the 2 KD's to the equation then it would be a 10-7 round

Equals 96- 92 for PAC.

Add also the 2 more PAC round in 11 and 12 as clearly even if Morales survives that round, he's not gonna win anymore rounds as he's shot already, no more legs, no more balance, no more nothing.

Add that up and you will have a

116-110 for PAC and that is already the most conservative calculation.

err... 116-110 isn't a competetive fight in my eyes. It's a beating.

So not only can't you write properly in your own language, but you cannot read it proficiently either? You are, undoubtedly, one of the dumbest posters I have ever encountered.

I said, after round nine, the scores in both fights were pretty much the same. 87 - 84 for Morales in the first, and 86 - 85 for Pac in the second (according to your own scorecard, and mine too). Yet you say the first fight was competitive and the second was not, which I find peculiar. And by "peculiar", I mean "really ******".

But let's go ahead and take into account round 10, which Morales also won the first time around. That gives him a 97 - 93 advantage. Pac decked Morales twice, for a 10 - 7 round, which would put the fight 96 - 92, a 4-point advantage, EXACTLY the same advantage in both cases. How is it that one of those was competitive and the other was not?

Then you completely lost it and went on to say that Pac would have won two rounds that never happened and somehow got to a 116 - 110 scorecard that exists only in your dreams. Well, I'll dream on too, and say that Morales wouldn't have given away the last two rounds, which he clearly did (boxing southpaw and all), if he hadn't already bagged the fight. And seeing as he had Pacquiao completely figured out, he wouldn't have played around but instead would have kept on tagging him with those left jabs en route to winning the last two rounds, for a final score of 117 - 111.

To paraphrase you, "117 - 111 isn't a competitive fight in my eyes. It's a beating".

[morancito]

When Morales is looking up at the stars, he is indeed owned. It was a brutal and ruthless end for a legend. Boxing is a cruel sport. Emmanuel Steward said that after the 6th round, he knew Morales was gonna quit. Thats owned.

Morales had the first fight so clearly bagged that he even toyed with Pacquiao by fighting southpaw, just to show off. That's owned.

See how that kind of terms doesn't add anything to the conversation?

[Manny_P]

Morales had the first fight so clearly bagged that he even toyed with Pacquiao by fighting southpaw, just to show off. That's owned.

See how that kind of terms doesn't add anything to the conversation?

yea, Pacquiao was "owned" by Morales in the 1st fight. LOL!!!!! WHEN Morales was the one lookin like he was gonna get KTFO!

[JaNnO]

So not only can't you write properly in your own language, but you cannot read it proficiently either? You are, undoubtedly, one of the dumbest posters I have ever encountered.

I said, after round nine, the scores in both fights were pretty much the same. 87 - 84 for Morales in the first, and 86 - 85 for Pac in the second (according to your own scorecard, and mine too). Yet you say the first fight was competitive and the second was not, which I find peculiar. And by "peculiar", I mean "really ******".

But let's go ahead and take into account round 10, which Morales also won the first time around. That gives him a 97 - 93 advantage. Pac decked Morales twice, for a 10 - 7 round, which would put the fight 96 - 92, a 4-point advantage, EXACTLY the same advantage in both cases. How is it that one of those was competitive and the other was not?

Then you completely lost it and went on to say that Pac would have won two rounds that never happened and somehow got to a 116 - 110 scorecard that exists only in your dreams. Well, I'll dream on too, and say that Morales wouldn't have given away the last two rounds, which he clearly did (boxing southpaw and all), if he hadn't already bagged the fight. And seeing as he had Pacquiao completely figured out, he wouldn't have played around but instead would have kept on tagging him with those left jabs en route to winning the last two rounds, for a final score of 117 - 111.

To paraphrase you, "117 - 111 isn't a competitive fight in my eyes. It's a beating".

if the first fight was 15 rounds, you know that pac could have stopped morales. pac clearly had the momentum after the 12th round.

[morancito]

yea, Pacquiao was "owned" by Morales in the 1st fight. LOL!!!!! WHEN Morales was the one lookin like he was gonna get KTFO!

Because he was fighting leftie, he was just playing, you could even tell it from his face. Morales seemed to have Pac completely figured out. He ****ing schooled him for most of the fight, much like JMM did the last 10 rounds of their bout. And about the word "owned", I was just trying to prove that it adds absolutely nothing to a conversation. Which it doesn't.

if the first fight was 15 rounds, you know that pac could have stopped morales.

Yeah and if the second one was 5 rounds, Morales would have gotten a unanimous decision.

You guys have a great imagination.

[dep_violator]

So not only can't you write properly in your own language, but you cannot read it proficiently either? You are, undoubtedly, one of the dumbest posters I have ever encountered.

I said, after round nine, the scores in both fights were pretty much the same. 87 - 84 for Morales in the first, and 86 - 85 for Pac in the second (according to your own scorecard, and mine too). Yet you say the first fight was competitive and the second was not, which I find peculiar. And by "peculiar", I mean "really ******".

But let's go ahead and take into account round 10, which Morales also won the first time around. That gives him a 97 - 93 advantage. Pac decked Morales twice, for a 10 - 7 round, which would put the fight 96 - 92, a 4-point advantage, EXACTLY the same advantage in both cases. How is it that one of those was competitive and the other was not?

Then you completely lost it and went on to say that Pac would have won two rounds that never happened and somehow got to a 116 - 110 scorecard that exists only in your dreams. Well, I'll dream on too, and say that Morales wouldn't have given away the last two rounds, which he clearly did (boxing southpaw and all), if he hadn't already bagged the fight. And seeing as he had Pacquiao completely figured out, he wouldn't have played around but instead would have kept on tagging him with those left jabs en route to winning the last two rounds, for a final score of 117 - 111.

To paraphrase you, "117 - 111 isn't a competitive fight in my eyes. It's a beating".

Dumb? If I'm dumb? Then what are you kid? Moronic? lol!

Just look at Morales doing the chicken dance in the 2nd and 6th.

[Manny_P]

Because he was fighting leftie, he was just playing, you could even tell it from his face. Morales seemed to have Pac completely figured out. He ****ing schooled him for most of the fight, much like JMM did the last 10 rounds of their bout. And about the word "owned", I was just trying to prove that it adds absolutely nothing to a conversation. Which it doesn't.



Yeah and if the second one was 5 rounds, Morales would have gotten a unanimous decision.

You guys have a great imagination.

Pac made Morales look like he was gonna get laid out. That's "school" to you? You don't know boxing homie. Schooling is what Raheem did to Morales. Morales WON a close fight against Manny.

GET REAL HOMBRE. Yo boi aint winning gainst ma man!