Actually i don't think i want pac vs bradley

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bushbaby
    Wild Apache
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 23513
    • 727
    • 370
    • 32,078

    #21
    Originally posted by straightleft
    Bradley has no power to make Pac honest like Marquez or Rios. The last fight Pac was just toying with him and fought just 1 minute in every round. Even so Pac still owned his ass. People are saying Pac can't bet a one leg Bradley but then if you watch this replay Pac was owning his ass and broke his ankle trying to avoid the onslaught.



    The post proves how ****** some Pacman fans are. You admit Pacman fought 1/3 of the fight yourself. You admit that that Bradley hurt his foot. You cry that Bradley hurt his foot avoiding the onslaught. Do you even watch boxing?? Is Bradley supposed to try and (get hit)?? Is that what boxing Pacman is supposed to be??

    Comment

    • Rome-By-Ko
      The winner Is
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 20157
      • 323
      • 332
      • 29,833

      #22
      Originally posted by 4Corners
      Well he can't really fight anyone else. It sucks Manny can't fight other WW like Guerrero, Alexander, or even Thurman or Broner/Maidana because of the promotional beef.
      Why would Pac fight any of those guys right now tho??I can see if he already fought and beat Bradley..That's not the case,I don't know where this mentality of the public believes I won so I'm good..What kinda standards are we holding fighters too nowa days??Pac you believe you won,train hard and go break down that wall..End of story..

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #23
        This is the only fight that makes sense for Pac,if ya ask me..Marquez don't want to fight him again..Bradley is willing(for the right price),make it happen..Bring your best..

        Comment

        • hugh grant
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2006
          • 30547
          • 2,201
          • 927
          • 105,596

          #24
          Again, we know Pac was robbed brutally in the first fight. So if they fight again, and lets say Bradley shocks the world and wins fairly......so what, he still robbed Pac in the first fight and it don't erase that from history. He should have given the belt back to Pac and then ask for a rematch to see if he could do better and take the fight to Pac like he said he would before the fight.

          Comment

          • sugarsmosley
            sugarsmosley
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 7393
            • 467
            • 436
            • 14,323

            #25
            Originally posted by Bushbaby
            I wouldn't want the rematch if I were a Pacman fan. Because Bradley on fresh wheels probably clearly wins this time.

            While I'm of the opinion that Pacman won the last time around, I still remember the: If Kendal Holt drop Bradley twice, Pacman destroys him", to Bradley going 12 hard fought rounds with 1 of boxing's best on some ****ed up feet. That's more amazing than much else tbh.
            I don't get how bradley breaking his ankle and going 12 rounds is amazing.... I love how fighters always have an excuse that they broke something when they had a bad fight. how did he break that ankle? do you just start breaking bones by looking up into the damn sky? if you're fighting me and im moving in a way to break your hands legs and ankles i must have some great foot movement.

            Comment

            • Tylotto
              Up and Comer
              Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
              • Dec 2012
              • 44
              • 2
              • 1
              • 12,152

              #26
              I'm done with Pacquiao rematches.He doesn't have much time left so I want to see him with new oppenets. What if he gets draws with Marquez or Bradley? Are we going to see Pac/Marquez 6? Pac/Bradley 3? When is enough enough?

              Comment

              • Mister Wolf
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2012
                • 7440
                • 242
                • 15
                • 107,507

                #27
                Manny is awkward to fight the first time for anyone. Based on what i saw I think Bradley has him figured out and would win a clear decision in a rematch. I don't think Bradley has ever fought a rematch and I would be interested to see what adjustments he makes.

                Comment

                • teddycanyon
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 1373
                  • 38
                  • 48
                  • 7,571

                  #28
                  If Bradley and Manny fought in a rematch I'd put money on Bradley. Bradley was injured very early on in the first fight, he may have even suffered the injury in training camp. Whatever the case may be, he was not himself that night. The guy who showed up to outfox Marquez could beat Pacquiao in a chess match too.

                  Comment

                  • shacasulu
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 398
                    • 35
                    • 0
                    • 925

                    #29
                    Bradley vs Pacquiao is a fight where society scored a fight based on a system BASED ON THEIR TASTE which is not wrong considering that the official scoring criteria does not specify what effective punching is but the WAY THE JUDGES SCORED IT THAT NIGHT IT IS ACTUALLY NOT WRONG EITHER.

                    They felt Bradley SCORED MORE which is plausible.

                    Brian Kenny had it for Bradley

                    Max Kellerman said several people he highly respected scored it for people.

                    Dwyer scored it for Bradley

                    While a small majority believed Bradley won to me that fight showed me how the scoring criteria NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIC.

                    WTF IS EFFECTIVE PUNCHING???

                    WTF DOES IT REALLY MEAN???

                    ITS SUBJECTIVE AND THEREFORE JUDGES BASICALLY CAN HAVE THEIR OWN SCORING STYLE.

                    The system must change.

                    Comment

                    • AgainstTheRopes
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Sep 2012
                      • 2902
                      • 103
                      • 56
                      • 9,429

                      #30
                      Well too bad, you'll likely get to see it twice more.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP