Actually i don't think i want pac vs bradley
Collapse
-
Bradley has no power to make Pac honest like Marquez or Rios. The last fight Pac was just toying with him and fought just 1 minute in every round. Even so Pac still owned his ass. People are saying Pac can't bet a one leg Bradley but then if you watch this replay Pac was owning his ass and broke his ankle trying to avoid the onslaught.
Last edited by straightleft; 12-02-2013, 11:27 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
IMO Pac clearly won the Bradley fight and don't see a reason for a rematch. I don't know what else Bradley can do better to beat Pac. The Marquez series have always been a fun affair even though a 5th fight is long on the tooth it should still be entertaining.
TR will continue to recycle their fighters with each other.Comment
-
If you notice, Top Rank never talks about Pacquiao-Bradley, dismissing Bradley as being too unmarketable to promote in a bout with Pacquiao. While that may be true to an extent, Bradley also possesses certain qualities that make him a bad style matchup for Pacquiao in a rematch.
Personally, I think Bradley will be a tougher out for Pacquiao if they fight a second time. While I do believe Pacquiao won their first fight big, I also saw that Bradley was compromised by a freak ankle injury early on and was still able to outbox and outland Pacquiao for stretches of the fight.
That Pacquiao was unable to capitalize suggests that he isn't the same fighter he was in years past.Comment
-
Arum wants to keep the WBO title in-house, so if he really wants Pacquiao to challenge Mayweather, i feel he wont put Pacquiao up against Bradley.If you notice, Top Rank never talks about Pacquiao-Bradley, dismissing Bradley as being too unmarketable to promote in a bout with Pacquiao. While that may be true to an extent, Bradley also possesses certain qualities that make him a bad style matchup for Pacquiao in a rematch.
Personally, I think Bradley will be a tougher out for Pacquiao if they fight a second time. While I do believe Pacquiao won their first fight big, I also saw that Bradley was compromised by a freak ankle injury early on and was still able to outbox and outland Pacquiao for stretches of the fight.
That Pacquiao was unable to capitalize suggests that he isn't the same fighter he was in years past.Comment
-
If you watch the video before Bradley twisted his ankle, He was running away from Pac because Pac was landing eight series of punches before the freak ankle injury happened. Watch the fight and open your eyes.If you notice, Top Rank never talks about Pacquiao-Bradley, dismissing Bradley as being too unmarketable to promote in a bout with Pacquiao. While that may be true to an extent, Bradley also possesses certain qualities that make him a bad style matchup for Pacquiao in a rematch.
Personally, I think Bradley will be a tougher out for Pacquiao if they fight a second time. While I do believe Pacquiao won their first fight big, I also saw that Bradley was compromised by a freak ankle injury early on and was still able to outbox and outland Pacquiao for stretches of the fight.
That Pacquiao was unable to capitalize suggests that he isn't the same fighter he was in years past.Comment
-
Hmmm a hardcore Pac fan saying it was all Pac. Must be true. lol but that fight was both guys missing alot and PAc won it, but it was not really much damage done other than to Bradleys leg lolComment
-
Hindi pwede, kasi Pacquiao-hater ako
Of course, the video you showed was of an early round. Who knows what would've happened had the injury not occurred. What I do know is that this new "compassionate" Pacquiao will have trouble dealing with guys who know how to steal rounds and win close fights.
Pacquiao missed a golden opportunity to get a win over a high-profile, unbeaten fighter there. I don't like his chances in the rematch nearly as much as I did in their first fight.Comment
Comment