Originally posted by T18Z
View Post
Murray would gain the benefit of huge HBO exposure and a massive viewer amount, more than he's ever had, even against Sergio.
Secondly, Martinez was the biggest paying fight for Murray to date. Now lets consider that Martinez is the lineal champion and brings much, much more money to the table than Golovkin ever could of dreamed of at the time, how is it even fair to assume Murray should be compensated when he is a contender, with no championship belt and someone who really doesn't have much of a following whatsoever compared to others. It would make no logical sense, if GGG is being paid 300-400k, for Murray to be paid more than the champion, who fights constantly on main events, is a rising star and has huge ratings, that is just essentially asking for a large pay-check to receive a beating.
I wasn't suggesting Murray should be paid more than Golovkin, both fighters should be paid more. It's arguably the two best in the division. Matthysse gets 800k fighting Garcia who got 1.8 million or something.
I understand your point anyway, essentially what I'm saying is how can he pass on a career high pay day, to now be facing no doubt some bum in Manchester for pennies, when he could be fighting for a legitimate world title, with the chance of beating the most feared fighter in boxing at the moment, and possibly landing himself future events on HBO. I'm British, but honestly besides Macklin, the whole middleweight scene for us Brits wreaks of scrounging for pay days, avoiding the best and getting the title in the easiest, least prestigious way as possible. They've all extinguished their Sergio shot, and now they sc**** the barrel for the smoothest option, Barker has succeeded, but we all know he's going nowhere with it and is the weakest of the champions.
Barker is avoiding Golovkin, and so far it looks that way for Murray too but Macklin fought him, and Lee wants to fight him.
Edit: just noticed you said besides Golovkin.
Comment