Golovkins amateur record is a lie!

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.

So, first they said he supposedly only lost once and that loss was avenged then it was 5 and now 8?


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Wrong guy, that's Lomachenko that supposedly lost only once. Not real plausible. But I can see why it bothers you, since Rigo has a minimum of 12 losses

Oh yea... My bad. That was at 6 in the am. Lol


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[Vasyl’s dad]

you just discovered the 8th wonder of the world. go press up some buttons, pin one on your fridge, another on your shirt and pass out the rest at your local goodwill.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[toshmurph]

It takes nothing from an impressive amateur pedigree really but if they (someone) has decreased the number of losses by a margin what is to say they haven't increased the number of wins too?

I'm don't think Golovkin has never conclusively stated his amateur record! I'm pretty sure the 350-5 record came from a video interview Golovkin gave to Ring Magazine, where he stated that but he didn't really sound sure, he said "I don't know 350-5" as if he wasn't sure! After that everybody from HBO and such started saying it was that!

So again I'm not saying this proves anything maybe there's more videos where he's stated it that number, but I'm not fully convinced he even cares much about his record let alone is in on some big scheme to market him to the masses! Especially seeing as casual fans don't give a **** about amateur record..

Whatever's the case 8 or 5 I won't stop rooting for him, he's a technically sound monster puncher that's fun to watch, what's not to like!

[torosboxing75]

This actually makes me realize what a beast this guy is. That is still an amazing record and I'm no GGG fan I'm a boxing fan.

[boxingfeind]

I wouldn`t be surprised if Golovlin has atleast 70 losses in the amateurs.I seen the Golovkin vs Dirrell fight and it was a straight up robbery against Dirrell.And the commentators was bias as hell.

[mezoomozaa]

I want to see the details of his +300 wins, please !

[Kris Silver]

Good research on the TS's part to be fair. Not seen much of the other stuff as to why he's getting so much grief though.

It is splitting hairs over 5-8 amatuer losses, when your talking 350 fights. Everyone has bad nights.

Let's put it in perspective, it's roughly a 2% loss rate.

Sugar Ray Leanard's amatuer record was 145-5. A 3.5% loss rate.

So the stat's point to Golovkin performing better in his early career than one of the best ever P4P fighters.

I'm purely making an example of the various ways you can wrap up stat's here. GGG's amatuer record is very good any which way you do wrap it up.

[SnakeVen0m]

Wait, he's had 8 losses instead of 5?!? Damn I thought this guy was legit. I'm actually not a fan of Golo anymore, this is too upsetting.

[Luilun]

350-5, or not. The guy has at least 8 losses and here they all are!

2002-03-09 71kg Damian Austin CUB +8:8 Halle, Germany Chemistry Cup Final

2002-04-10 71kg Suriya Prasathinpimai THA 22:19 ****kok, Thailand Kings Cup Final

2003-05-17 71kg Andre Dirrell USA 15:14 Tunica, USA dual USA-KZK dual USA-KZK 12:8

2004-05-29 75kg Yordanis Despaigne CUB 37:34 Athens, Greece Olympic Test Event Semi-final

2004-08-28 75kg Gaydarbek Gaydarbekov RUS 28:18 Athens, Greece Olympic Games Final

2005-03-26 75kg Nikolay Galochkin RUS 20:9 Baku, Azerbaijan Chowdry Cup Semi-Final

2005-04-14 75kg Eduard Gutknecht GER 17:13 Halle, Germany Chemie Pokal Quarter-Final

2005-11-16 75kg Mohamed Hikal EGY 27:21 Mianyang, China World Champs Preliminaries

You would make inch high private eye look even smaller

[Hougigo]

Good research on the TS's part to be fair. Not seen much of the other stuff as to why he's getting so much grief though.

It is splitting hairs over 5-8 amatuer losses, when your talking 350 fights. Everyone has bad nights.

Let's put it in perspective, it's roughly a 2% loss rate.

Sugar Ray Leanard's amatuer record was 145-5. A 3.5% loss rate.

So the stat's point to Golovkin performing better in his early career than one of the best ever P4P fighters.

I'm purely making an example of the various ways you can wrap up stat's here. GGG's amatuer record is very good any which way you do wrap it up.

yea, he's done research... I just dont understand why he hates golovkim so much.
I just feel like he's turning over every stone to find a way to discredit him