For people that say Bradley ducked Khan for Pacquiao...

[Ray*]

Bradley himself admit losing to khan at that stage would have ruin his career, he admit ducking the fight that he called for at that time, but hey he got paid right? Yay it was a great "business" decision for Boxingscene.

[Frank Ducketts]

I can't be mad at you saying nobody can use the quote,it is what it is..



I have respect for you Dan,so please don't make me have to call ya a name that I don't wanna..For now I'll just call it a misunderstanding,and point out directly when he says Shaw's name..At 4:35 Bradley is ask does it come down to if ya take the fight are you stuck with Gary Shaw..Which then in turn while answering Bradley says the whole thing what if he loses..It had everything to do with being stuck with Shaw..I'm also very sure that Bradley not having a multi fight deal did not help the situation..Please don't be a moron like ya pal Dirk..I'm very tired of owning him already on all things Bradley..Don't fall victim ..

LMAo..

Very good post. The undeniable truth.

[Frank Ducketts]

Only the mentally weak think that Bradley ducked Khan. Only the mentally weak.

[IronDanHamza]

I can't be mad at you saying nobody can use the quote,it is what it is..



I have respect for you Dan,so please don't make me have to call ya a name that I don't wanna..For now I'll just call it a misunderstanding,and point out directly when he says Shaw's name..At 4:35 Bradley is ask does it come down to if ya take the fight are you stuck with Gary Shaw..Which then in turn while answering Bradley says the whole thing what if he loses..It had everything to do with being stuck with Shaw..I'm also very sure that Bradley not having a multi fight deal did not help the situation..Please don't be a moron like ya pal Dirk..I'm very tired of owning him already on all things Bradley..Don't fall victim ..

LMAo..

You're reaching, badly.

When asked if it means he has to stay with Shaw he said "that's a possibility."

Then completely off the Shaw subject he refutes the Khan fight "being good money" by saying "at the end of the day, it's risky. What if I lose the fight? I'm out the sweepstakes then"

Nothing to do with Shaw when making that statement.

You're not going to accept it and it is what it is but it's pretty black and white obvious that at this particular time he wasn't interested in taking the risk of fighting Khan with Pacquaio pay days in his possible near future.

[F!x]

Exactly, obviously Bradley ducked Khan, it was the most public duck in the history of boxing.

Amazing how people will try to rewrite history even when they're confronted with irrefutable evidence. Must be weak-minded people who can't accept the truth so they always live in fantasy land.

[mathed]

Please, Tim is like a fine cuban cigar that you pay top dollar for at a specialty store and Khan is like a pouch of backwoods that you can get at the local checks cashed store.

They shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence to be honest.

Bradley:


Khan:

[shade darkar]

How is this any different from Khan ducking Devon Alexander to get a shot at Mayweather?

its not any different. bradley clearly ducked khan because "what if i lose, im out of the pacman sweepstakes" no real fighter should be thinking, what if i lose. it disgusts me.

[Rome-By-Ko]

You're reaching, badly.

When asked if it means he has to stay with Shaw he said "that's a possibility."

Then completely off the Shaw subject he refutes the Khan fight "being good money" by saying "at the end of the day, it's risky. What if I lose the fight? I'm out the sweepstakes then"

Nothing to do with Shaw when making that statement.

You're not going to accept it and it is what it is but it's pretty black and white obvious that at this particular time he wasn't interested in taking the risk of fighting Khan with Pacquaio pay days in his possible near future.

What's sad here is that I believe your an old man..About 60 if I remember correct..How do you figure he was talking about something else??Was he asked another question??Did he himself say Khans name??No he did not,stop it already bro..Was Khan a risky fight,no doubt about it..Was TR a better deal??Yep no doubt about it..

It was not only just Pac,it was the deal of more then one fight..I bring your age up because you have been on this earth long enough to understand that nothing is that black and white ever..GBP/Shaw did not have a multi fight deal in place TR did..It was a better deal,not to say Khan was not a risky fight..Just that it's really short sided to say this is the only reason why this fight did not happen..Esp when Khan himself signed three fight deals after fighting a throw away fight with Mccloskey..

It's not a duck to take a better deal..