Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ellerbe: "Mayweather vs Khan isn't done deal yet. Contracts arent signed"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by junior gong View Post
    Only someone like you or the rest of the village people would have to 'wonder' about such a thing. Froch v GGG at 168 in february, anyone?
    There is no connection between the two. If you think Canelo was drained, just post it. its a valid opinion.

    But to imply/post that the reason you think it is because floyd said it about cotto in 2012 so I'm saying it now is kinda gay.

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
      There is no connection between the two. If you think Canelo was drained, just post it. its a valid opinion.

      But to imply/post that the reason you think it is because floyd said it about cotto in 2012 so I'm saying it now is kinda gay.
      Neither fighter was drained, Canelo was a great win imo as was Cotto for Manny. And 'kind of gay'? I seem to recall you and the rest of team spastic saying for years that Cotto was drained even though he said he wasnt.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by KickAzz View Post
        what has khan done to deserve this fight?


        hes fast, and poses a major threat to floyd. this fight is just what boxing needs. i hope its on ppv so i can continue supporting the money team. The best thing its also on may 4th YES, itwill probably have a strong undercard with mexicans and if it sells floyd can take all the credit.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
          So do u personally think it matters? Did those 2lbs make canelo and or cotto lose?
          IMO neither made much difference. But they're not on level ground, since only one of these guys spat on another for requesting it, and discounted his dominant win. Nobody likes a CW, but CW + hypocrisy is worse. There's a few more reasons why Floyd's request was worse, but this is enough for now.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
            Uhoh I see you're trying to hit me up for more logic 101 lessons. I've already given you too much time with scant results, I like to see progress. Like here, you trying to divert to Marg really does nothing to wash away Floyd's/Ellerbe's/your hypocrisy on CWs.

            Remember, it's the intent that counts. Clearly they were hoping Canelo comes in drained, hence the humiliating request. And if Cotto was drained, Canelo showed more signs of drainage.
            Divert? I posted what floyd said. I know truth is not something you like, but I'm sure any video you have proves this is what he said.

            Ohh, so you are talking about floyd and ellerbee being hypocritical regarding cw's. what does that have to do with the thread?

            SO its the intent. they wanted canelo to come in drained. If cotto was drained (suggesting you don't think he was) then Canelo was more drained.

            so you think canelo at 152 was more drained than cotto at 145. cool. what does that have to do with a possible khan v floyd fight?

            Comment


            • #86
              i don't know with you people if you're still gonna support a fraud.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by junior gong View Post
                Neither fighter was drained, Canelo was a great win imo as was Cotto for Manny. And 'kind of gay'? I seem to recall you and the rest of team spastic saying for years that Cotto was drained even though he said he wasnt.
                the only thing I said was i agreed with ellerbee then and that it would be the same for floyd.

                MY point still stands-floyd/ellerbee and whatever they said about cotto v manny should have no bearing on an opinion herobando has on floyd v canelo.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                  IMO neither made much difference. But they're not on level ground, since only one of these guys spat on another for requesting it, and discounted his dominant win. Nobody likes a CW, but CW + hypocrisy is worse. There's a few more reasons why Floyd's request was worse, but this is enough for now.
                  Idc about who's request was worse or who gets ridiculed for what. At the end of the day, both fights happened at cws and both fighters manny, and Floyd, still get the appropriate level of credit for it as far as I'm concerned. If ppl wanna sit here and argue semantics, they are doing that because they clearly favor one fighter over the other. In the end both manny and Floyd are hypocrites. That is also true. But it is also true both wins were very good wins against world level top ranked fighters. The cotto win has things that can be nitpicked about just as well as the Caneko win. I just find it funny that u guys like to argue about which win counts more as if there's a way to make it fact and not opinion.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
                    Divert? I posted what floyd said. I know truth is not something you like, but I'm sure any video you have proves this is what he said.

                    Ohh, so you are talking about floyd and ellerbee being hypocritical regarding cw's. what does that have to do with the thread?

                    SO its the intent. they wanted canelo to come in drained. If cotto was drained (suggesting you don't think he was) then Canelo was more drained.

                    so you think canelo at 152 was more drained than cotto at 145. cool. what does that have to do with a possible khan v floyd fight?
                    But you bringing in Marg does is immaterial to the argument we're having. Which is that Floyd discounts Pac's Cotto win due to the CW. The same criteria would discount his own Canelo win. It's not like I called Floyd a hypocrite for loading his own gloves while putting down Marg, get it? I don't believe you had a point in mind, just trying to create a diversion, obvious tactics.

                    I'm just answering that guy's question, jeez, so sensitive. Especially for a paid shill.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
                      Idc about who's request was worse or who gets ridiculed for what. At the end of the day, both fights happened at cws and both fighters manny, and Floyd, still get the appropriate level of credit for it as far as I'm concerned. If ppl wanna sit here and argue semantics, they are doing that because they clearly favor one fighter over the other. In the end both manny and Floyd are hypocrites. That is also true. But it is also true both wins were very good wins against world level top ranked fighters. The cotto win has things that can be nitpicked about just as well as the Caneko win. I just find it funny that u guys like to argue about which win counts more as if there's a way to make it fact and not opinion.
                      Bud, when I registered here the Cotto CW was the #1 topic here. for about 3 years it was the dominant topic on this board, with a 100 page thread comparing the request to Al Qaeda terrorism. Floyd got off very easy, especially taking into account his massive hypocrisy on the subject.

                      Any time you wanna know why Floyd's was worse (in addition to staggering hypocrisy), let me know. we can open a new thread

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP