He's legitimately only "gone thru" the 2000s. He's only "briefly visited" the other two decades you're giving him credit for.
If he's still undefeated in 2026, then he'll legitimately "gone thru" 3 decades. (1996-2016)
Until then, you should just say, "who's gone undefeated from 1996-2013?"
If he's still undefeated in 2026, then he'll legitimately "gone thru" 3 decades. (1996-2016)
Until then, you should just say, "who's gone undefeated from 1996-2013?"
.
Comment