How many fighters have gone thru 3 different decades undefeated?

[sparkman0811]

Ricardo Lopez: 1985-2001 Undefeated (3 decades)

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Ricardo Lopez: 1985-2001 Undefeated (3 decades)

He has a draw doe. That means he's not undefeated apparently.

[junior gong]

90's 1 decade,2000's another decade..2010's another decade



over 20 champions...and 5 current lineal champions...and 9 current or former lineal champions in all

You have said all this a million times before as well as other embarrassing episodes. Whats your point? Why didnt you just bump one of the thousand other 'I really want floyd to give it to me in the arse' threads you have made before?

[Russian Crushin]

both have draws

Yea, so? They're both undefeated in 3 decades....Which is what this thread is addressing

[sparkman0811]

He has a draw doe. That means he's not undefeated apparently.

Haha. You're funny. Ricardo Lopez was never defeated, he never lost. Therefore, undefeated champion, baby! And Still! 3 Decades, baby! And Still!. 51 have tried and 51 have failed. And Still!

[ModernTalking]

Unduckfeated for three decades , *****s and their math.

Anyway none but just The CatchWeight King Fraud.

[daggum]

ok we all know a decade is 11 years but are you saying floyd's been undefeated for 33 years? i don't know if i believe you

[J The UnBiased]

another floyd is great thread,,, C'mon man,, we get it,, floyd is a great fighter,, he just isnt the GOAT,,,,,,,

Most fighters clean out divisions,,, floyd nearly cleaned out 130,, but thats about it,,,
He has some great wins, but he has more non-fights that get talked about that hurts his legacy,,
you never hear people complain about SRR, ali, srl, oscar, holyfield, because they for the most part fought everyone on the block,,, floyd never did that, and has alot of people fooled like he is greatest ever,,,, Floyd hasnt even been undefeated for 2 decades let alone 3,, 96-13 is 17 years,, plus he has had a retirement and long streaks of inactivity,,

the dude has like 45 fights undefeated,, that has been accomplished alot of times, joe calzaghe, marciano, duran, zarate, james toney,, but all those guys fought the absolute best around whereas floyd did not,,,
you cant say with a straight face that at 135 sosa and ndou were the best options when spadafora, lazcano, johnston, freitas, casamoyer were all prime
or at 140 he faced bruscels gatti and shambra when there was hatton, cotto, tsyzu, witter, maussa, etc
or 147 when there was shane, cotto, margs, williams, etc,,,,

truely great fighters want to prove they are great by fighting top fighters like SRL vs benetiz and hearns,
or oscar vs tito, shane, vargas and ike,,,
or holyfield vs foreman, dokes, bowe, mercer, tyson, lewis,

so lets not get it twisted my man,,, i know you love some floyd but damn get off his nuts

Fair points, but a lot of the criticism of Floyd's resume really doesn't stem from who's on his list. It stems from Floyd claiming he's the best ever, for years. When you go out and say things like that, you force people to hold a microscope to what you've really done. Truthfully, Floyd's resume isn't a bad one by any stretch. It's not up there with the great of the great resume's but it's still a damn good one. Just good. As far as Floyd didn't fight this or that, there's a rhyme for every reason.

[J The UnBiased]

First thing i could think of was
How many fighters can go undefeated vs hand picked
Average opposition .

I understand not liking a guy, but to sit here and lie and make it seem like Floyd is universally recognized as the best active fighter because he only fights average opposition....it's laughable

[J The UnBiased]

90's 1 decade,2000's another decade..2010's another decade



over 20 champions...and 5 current lineal champions...and 9 current or former lineal champions in all

don't state the facts, it doesn't mean a thing here. All of those weren't really champs, they were paid actors