My intention on this thread is to have a mature discussion. It is not to ridicule anyone involved, that includes the women alleged to be in the tape having sex with Bronner (I have not seen the tape), Paulie M, his lady friend whom Adrein Bronner became "friends" with, etc.
Bronner, an African American male, obviously had a real distaste for Malinogi...After the close fight he was rude and disrespectful....leading one to assume he had at least had quite a bit of antipathy for his opponent. Furthermore here was an absolute chance for Bronner to really be his film loving self and in the process stick it to Paulie! All Bronner had to do was seduce this obviously somewhat dim, relatively attractive white girl, film it and man oh man would he have shown Paulie!!!!
Yet, what do we get? this white women publicly states what a nice guy Adriene is/was, leading one to assume that whether intimate, or not, Adriene did not treat this woman in a fashion he seems more than ready to treat women of his own race.
Yes folks, the women being filmed servicing mr Bronner are "ratchets", "whores", etc right? but the starry eyed white girl is Adriene's special friend. Think about it for a moment.....Are you feeling me? If your life depended on it would you assume:
a) Adriene had a platonic relationship with this relatively attractive simple Brooklyn Girl in which they found a certain friendship....
b) or that Adriene had put his member in yet another, probably sans rubber?
So if anyone follows T Sotomayor on YouTube I can well imagine Tommy saying something to the effect of "this is how Black women are viewed..yada yada"
My own feeling? is that Bronner's double standard is a de****able example of an ignorant prejudice demonstrating something more shameful than the need to film sexual escapades for attention: namely Bronner gives the pretty white girl a pass.....and why? do I have to spell it out? Ps for the record I am a white guy, for what it is worth. I am not trying to transgress my own orientation and assume anything about Bronner other than what his obvious double standard leads me to conclude.....thoughts?
Bronner, an African American male, obviously had a real distaste for Malinogi...After the close fight he was rude and disrespectful....leading one to assume he had at least had quite a bit of antipathy for his opponent. Furthermore here was an absolute chance for Bronner to really be his film loving self and in the process stick it to Paulie! All Bronner had to do was seduce this obviously somewhat dim, relatively attractive white girl, film it and man oh man would he have shown Paulie!!!!
Yet, what do we get? this white women publicly states what a nice guy Adriene is/was, leading one to assume that whether intimate, or not, Adriene did not treat this woman in a fashion he seems more than ready to treat women of his own race.
Yes folks, the women being filmed servicing mr Bronner are "ratchets", "whores", etc right? but the starry eyed white girl is Adriene's special friend. Think about it for a moment.....Are you feeling me? If your life depended on it would you assume:
a) Adriene had a platonic relationship with this relatively attractive simple Brooklyn Girl in which they found a certain friendship....
b) or that Adriene had put his member in yet another, probably sans rubber?
So if anyone follows T Sotomayor on YouTube I can well imagine Tommy saying something to the effect of "this is how Black women are viewed..yada yada"
My own feeling? is that Bronner's double standard is a de****able example of an ignorant prejudice demonstrating something more shameful than the need to film sexual escapades for attention: namely Bronner gives the pretty white girl a pass.....and why? do I have to spell it out? Ps for the record I am a white guy, for what it is worth. I am not trying to transgress my own orientation and assume anything about Bronner other than what his obvious double standard leads me to conclude.....thoughts?
what dim, relatively attractive white girl, film it and man oh man would he have shown Paulie!!!!
Comment