I like Bradley, but he's just not that good.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Go and read back this very thread and I've told you how Pauli was ranked #5.

If we give questionable Holt the benefit of the doubt then they both have three.

Fair enough..I still hold firm that those rankings are a bit questionable tho..

[IronDanHamza]

BTW,Khan was never ranked ahead of Hatton..He was ranked 3rd behind Hatton before Hatton retired..Khan was never a higher rank tho..

Just checked the December 2009 Ring Magazine I have and Khan wasn't ranked ahead of Hatton. Perhaps an error.

Devon Alexander however was ranked above Urango and at #4 at the end of 2009 and the rest of the rankings are right.

[NEETzsche]

bradley's "x factor" is his versatility.

[Basco]

Don't get me wrong I'm not hating, I admire his chin, relentlessness and will but he's just not 'elite', he doesn't have the 'it factor'. He has no power, and his defense really isn't anything special either, he is certainly not 'slick' it pisses me off when I hear people call him slick and a 'technician' like Schafer did, I think the 'slick' label simply comes from him being African American.

He's now ranked no3 p4p by the ring which is an absolute joke, sorry but he would get beaten again by Pacquiao easily, Ortiz would possibly beat him(yes I did just say that ), Danny Garcia would beat him and he'd have zero chance against Mayweather.

A robbery against Pac and a out boxing of an old man? Sorry I'm not buying the hype, yeah I know you'll bring up the Marquez KO but I don't follow triangle theories, Marquez always had Pac's number and even then you have to remember that they fought 4 times and Pac knocked him down like 5 times.

I like Bradley, but he's nothing special.

[IMG]http://i131.***********.com/albums/p305/kyaroso/77144_10152248796215439_62645225_n_zps7e0c8069.jpg[/IMG]