Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

real talk, Bradley's resume is better than Mayweather's at age 30

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    NSB.

    I can't believe Bradley overtook Floyd since last night. Come on.

    Comment


    • #62
      I wonder how many people who don't believe for a second that Bradley beat Pacquiao are counting Pacquiao just to give Bradley the edge in this argument.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
        I wonder how many people who don't believe for a second that Bradley beat Pacquiao are counting Pacquiao just to give Bradley the edge in this argument.
        about half as many as the people who don't believe for a second Floyd beat Castillo in the 1st fight but ignoring that to give Mayweather the edge in this argument

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by LBJ2010 View Post
          about half as many as the people who don't believe for a second Floyd beat Castillo in the 1st fight but ignoring that to give Mayweather the edge in this argument
          Mayweather has Castillo 2. Bradley doesn't have Pacquiao 2.

          Comment


          • #65
            Stopped reading when you counted the Pacquiao fight as a real win

            Comment


            • #66
              Bradley has a better resume than Floyd. He was brave enough to fight Pac which must be given brownie points.

              If he can rob Pac, he would have robbed any of Floyds opponents as well. Bradley would have got gift decisions over Castillo, Zudah.

              Comment


              • #67
                wtf is wrong with some of you cats? tim has a great resume but floyds is better. not to mention he moved up multiple weight divisions. also remove pacquiao from that list, tim didnt beat him. had he beaten him convincingly then i would say tim

                Comment


                • #68
                  doesnt matter if Bradley beat Pac or not, point is he fought the guy Floyd avoided for 5 years. plus Bradley fights guys when they were in their prime like Alexander, Peterson, Holt ...while Floyd fights big name shot old fighters like Gatti and DLH....so Floyd gets all the credit when in reality Bradley really fought the tougher guys they just didnt have a big name. Bradley *****s all over Floyd's resume at the same age not even close

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Last week this thread wouldn't even be made.
                    Last edited by MPX309; 10-15-2013, 07:07 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      :bukkake:
                      Originally posted by Dunkeroo23 View Post
                      let's look at their top 5 wins by age 30:

                      Mayweather:
                      1. Corrales
                      2. Castillo
                      3. Hernandez
                      4. De La Hoya
                      5. Hatton

                      Bradley:
                      1. Marquez
                      2. Pacquiao
                      3. Alexander
                      4. Peterson
                      5. Holt

                      Plus, Bradley's resume runs much deeper than Floyd's (Witter, Cherry, Campbell, Provonidkov, Casamayor, Abregu, etc.) and you can argue he hasnt ducked anyone. both undefeated, both had one questionable win. Yet at this age, Mayweather was already considered the best P4P fighter for 6 years and ATG, while Bradley still fights just to earn respect, even though his resume is better or at worse just as good. seriously, if Bradley had a stronger personality and fanbase he'd already be considered a legend. again, talking about resume only and not hypothetical fantasy matches

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP