I've seen some posts that suggest some bias from the HBO commentary, but I was watching the Sky coverage of this fight and had to put up with the truly appalling Nick Halling, who seemed more content on concentrating on what Marquez wasn't doing rather than the actual in-ring content.
Was the American commentary as bad as the British commentary?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
I found it pretty funny that Richie Woodhall was so adamant that this was such a clear and comfortable victory for Bradley, but then credited Pacquiao as being among one of Bradley's wins.
For the record, I thought Bradley did win a well earned decision, so this isn't me whining over the verdict. I had Tim by two points and don't see anything wrong with having the fight even a little bit wider, but the commentary was so overly biased in Bradley's favour that you'd think Bradley were dominating almost every round.Comment
Comment