Is Roy Jones Jr. the most skilled boxer ever?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joe Grizzley
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Feb 2013
    • 717
    • 168
    • 43
    • 6,383

    #31
    Originally posted by Money Team.
    no,not at all...if he was he'd still be kicking ass today,he was athletic an depended on speed and reflex's..he lacked the fundamentals and that cost him int he long rin

    You don't know what the fu^ck your talking about. Fighters get old, thats what happened here.

    Comment

    • MRBOOMER
      My skin I get it
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 3115
      • 109
      • 1
      • 9,858

      #32
      He's was very skilled just not versatile his skills depended on his body his body and ring skills were so entwined that if he didn't have one he couldn't show the other. It took skills to get people outta position feint and it took great timing to set people up with the shots he did he had great ring general ship too but ima big roy fan so my oppinon about him is always good.

      Comment

      • Jc8804
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2013
        • 6231
        • 394
        • 143
        • 30,652

        #33
        Skills-punches ,head movement/slipping ,blocking/catching,footwork,

        Intangables/ingredients- heart , toughness ,resistance/chin,stamina,

        Talent/gifts- reflexes,hand speed,foot speed,quickness,power,strength,balance,athleticism

        IQ

        Apply all this to roy overall i got

        From a scale of 1-10

        1. 9

        2. 8 and a half

        3. 10

        4. 9

        Roys speed , reflex, punch selection , and head movement
        And balance was out of this world not to mention his pioneered style .

        Comment

        • Kingjames6Flee
          Starz of a New Era
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2013
          • 1456
          • 54
          • 3
          • 7,960

          #34
          Originally posted by WladsChin
          Lmfao....... you are a moron.

          Broner isn't as well rounded as Jones..

          If Roy Jones Jr took a really big dump... that dump will be Adrien Broner.

          Roy should leave his flaccid *** in Broner's mouth.
          Roy was too ****in Good. But he relied on athleticism which is y I dont think hes more skilled than broner.
          Last edited by Kingjames6Flee; 10-08-2013, 10:40 AM.

          Comment

          • DLT
            DMV
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 17087
            • 737
            • 35
            • 24,277

            #35
            Originally posted by edgarg
            I think that Phonius Phloydius had about a 60-65% KO average at 130 lbs. Pretty good but not "knocking everyone out". Also he fought a load of palookas whom I'd bet would have fallen down if pushed a little. I recall looking this up a few years ago. Much like Sam Peter's earlier fights.

            There have been so many really skilled boxers in history that it is impossible to select just one. There must be hundreds who could be qualified. And very many of them were never champions or even close to being so. They had other problems.

            As for Roy Jones I believe that he was one of the most skilled boxers in his era, and that skill is downplayed and pooh-poohed by ignorant newcomers to boxing who have not dipped deeply into the available info.
            you are wrong and it proves that you are a noob to boxing. Floyd had a 75% KO ratio at SFW and he stopped alot of top guys like Chico, Chavez, Hernandez, Manfredy, etc... You are also wrong in saying that he fought bums. Even his harshest crritics think his SFW run is argubaly the best ever and he is universally ranked as the 1st or 2nd best SFW ever

            Comment

            • DominiBox
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 1898
              • 64
              • 17
              • 8,458

              #36
              I'm from DR.... so because of the language barrier, sometimes is hard to express some thoughts. Having said that, what's the difference here between SKILLS / GIFTS / TALENT?

              Comment

              • Daddy T
                BigDaddy
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 5637
                • 198
                • 156
                • 12,260

                #37
                probably the most naturally gifted

                Comment

                • bojangles1987
                  bo jungle
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 41118
                  • 1,326
                  • 357
                  • 63,028

                  #38
                  Originally posted by DominiBox
                  I'm from DR.... so because of the language barrier, sometimes is hard to express some thoughts. Having said that, what's the difference here between SKILLS / GIFTS / TALENT?
                  Probably get disagreement, but:

                  Skills: Timing, footwork, counter punching, head movement, effectively throwing punches, etc.

                  Talent: Physical gifts like speed, power, chin, etc.

                  Comment

                  • WladsChin
                    Banned
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Oct 2013
                    • 144
                    • 17
                    • 0
                    • 212

                    #39
                    Originally posted by DominiBox
                    I'm from DR.... so because of the language barrier, sometimes is hard to express some thoughts. Having said that, what's the difference here between SKILLS / GIFTS / TALENT?
                    When Lewis out boxed Holyfield using and setting traps, counter punching, and overall ring generalship. That's skills.

                    When Lewis shoulder rolled Briggs, that's probably more natural athleticism and gifts.

                    When Wladimir controls the distance with his jab that's skills.. the fact that Wlad is 6'6 245 and still able to move the way he does is gift/talent.

                    Comment

                    • djtmal
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 13165
                      • 1,294
                      • 11
                      • 39,097

                      #40
                      Originally posted by bojangles1987
                      Roy's skill level has become cruelly and unfairly underrated because of his decline. People have come to the ridiculous conclusion that all he had was athleticism. Roy was a terrifically skilled boxer with great timing, great body punching, a very intelligent boxing brain, and the ability to throw any punch in the book from anywhere in the ring and hit it.

                      He wasn't the most skilled ever, but he was far more skilled than people remember him right now.
                      Agree. Against far lessor comp, maybe all he needed was athleticism, but he handily outboxed hopkins and toney. You don't beat guys like that with just athleticism. He could jab/right hand with the best of em, but I think his greatest asset was his in ring thinking process. I think he took the basics a step further

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP