Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lennox Lewis: If Povetkin Lands Flush, Wladimir Will Fall

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Lennox earned more money for one fight than Klit did for 10

    LL is a rich man who lives a modest life, he's never been a excessive spender.

    At one point he was the highest earning sports star in the UK and top 3 in the world, above Naz

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by WladsChin View Post
      but Lewis took a lot more punishment overall from big punchers.

      Vitali-Briggs-Mercer-Tua-Mason-Ruddock-Morrison- are all massive punchers... and Lewis beat them all.

      Wladimir fought a lot less punchers and let's be fair here... Mccall I was highly debatable... Why you trashing one fighter to make your own fighter look good?

      Grow the **** up.
      going by your name you are not trashing vlad I can see. take your own advice instead of lecturing me

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by FloydvsPac View Post
        I remember there being a dispute over drug testing for this fight, which means Povetkin could be taking what many fighters and athletes are taking...HGH, synthetic testosterone and EPO. PEDs that cannot be detected under regular commission drug testing.

        If VADA wasn't involved in testing for this fight, it is possible Povetkin will KO Wladimir.
        aren't the tests a big ***in joke?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by WladsChin View Post
          Lennox IS one of the greatest heavyweights of all times you ***ing ******.

          Historians say it, boxing media say it, fellow boxers say it. You are nothing compare to them.

          Lewis was also KTFO once...... the Mccall fight was early stoppage and at worst very debatable... He also AVENGED his KO defeat.

          List me 5 champions that avenged their KO defeat.

          Go
          Just my opinion. I don't care what historians say when it comes to Lennox. He's a great boxer, but I believe he benefited mostly from his size advantage and lack of restrictions in the heavyweight division. Most of his fights were mismatches. No different than a middleweight facing a welterweight. Same goes with the Klitschkos. I consider Tommy Hearns who had the same style more accomplished than Lennox because he only had a height and reach advantages against his opponents. Lennox had height, reach and weight advantages.

          Even with his physical advantages, Lennox still got KO'd twice with one punch by much lesser opponents. So, in my opinion, Lennox Lewis is NOT an All-Time-Great in the heavyweight division.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by WladsChin View Post
            Lennox IS one of the greatest heavyweights of all times you ***ing ******.

            Historians say it, boxing media say it, fellow boxers say it. You are nothing compare to them.

            Lewis was also KTFO once...... the Mccall fight was early stoppage and at worst very debatable... He also AVENGED his KO defeat.

            List me 5 champions that avenged their KO defeat.

            Go


            LL's nuts rest comfortably on your chin. lol

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by FloydvsPac View Post
              Just my opinion. I don't care what historians say when it comes to Lennox. He's a great boxer, but I believe he benefited mostly from his size advantage and lack of restrictions in the heavyweight division. Most of his fights were mismatches. No different than a middleweight facing a welterweight. Same goes with the Klitschkos. I consider Tommy Hearns who had the same style more accomplished than Lennox because he only had a height and reach advantages against his opponents. Lennox had height, reach and weight advantages.

              Even with his physical advantages, Lennox still got KO'd twice with one punch by much lesser opponents. So, in my opinion, Lennox Lewis is NOT an All-Time-Great in the heavyweight division.

              Agreed and well put.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by FloydvsPac View Post
                Just my opinion. I don't care what historians say when it comes to Lennox. He's a great boxer, but I believe he benefited mostly from his size advantage and lack of restrictions in the heavyweight division. Most of his fights were mismatches. No different than a middleweight facing a welterweight. Same goes with the Klitschkos. I consider Tommy Hearns who had the same style more accomplished than Lennox because he only had a height and reach advantages against his opponents. Lennox had height, reach and weight advantages.

                Even with his physical advantages, Lennox still got KO'd twice with one punch by much lesser opponents. So, in my opinion, Lennox Lewis is NOT an All-Time-Great in the heavyweight division.

                Weight: (Keep in mind most of the 90's and early 2000's Heavys were in shape)

                Lennox Lewis fought a total of 24 fighters around 230-250 Pounds.

                Height:
                Lennox Lewis is 14-0 against 6'4+ fighters.

                Being taller actually works against you vs LL since 14 tall mother****as have tried and 14 tall mother****as have failed.




                Punching Power:
                Golota/Tua/Vitali/Tyson/Mason/Briggs/Ruddock/Morrison/Mercer/Bruno/.

                Has anyone ever fought as many big punchers as LL. I doubt it.



                Lewis was knocked out by Rahman. Lewis avenged his defeat. Name me someone else that did. Lewis was more past prime vs Rahman than Tyson was against Douglas.................... Lewis avenged his defeat, Tyson did not. Rahman is twice the fighter Douglas was .So I guess Tyson is not an ATG HW as well. If you hold 'upsets' as a criteria for judging who's an ATG Heavyweight.. you are a moron.




                Name me 20 Heavyweights better than Lewis. you delusional ****ing 140 pound loving nut hugger ****.





                For you to say 'It's my opinion, I don't care what EVERYONE else smarter than me thinks. I am a free thinking man. LENNOX LEWIS IS NOT AN ATG HEAVYWEIGHT'

                Is like me walking around saying The World is Flat. **** Science and facts. I'm a free thinking College Student, **** World is Flat ...'


                Even the Lewis haters acknowledge Lewis as an ATG Heavyweight you delusional ******ed gimp looking midget ****.


                Name me 20 Heavyweights greater than Lewis. I will break down their resumes..


                You caponze midget loving rasta ****.

                What do you want Lewis to do? GO UNDEFEATED against his resume? Than he will be the GOAT HW.. Lol....

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by FloydvsPac View Post
                  Lennox would know, wouldn't he? Lennox could've been one of the greatest heavyweights of all-time, if he was knocked out cold by one punch twice in his career by much lesser opponents.
                  Take it you never seen either of the fights, or you have no idea what being knocked out cold is.

                  Or you could just be a complete ****

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Klitschko failed. Let me show you an example of landing flush

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOnVBx_yqc

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by rob g View Post
                      Klitschko failed. Let me show you an example of landing flush

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOnVBx_yqc
                      I didn't know Mikkel Kessler had a bigger, crazier older brother.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP