why do you take any point made to the extreme and then try and argue it backwards? I asked a simple question the answer to which is yes. If it was no, you would have said no.
SInce you can't say no, your opinion becomes that fights were tougher because the fact is cotto and shane were considered #1 when floyd beat them. You can't just shape your opinions to suit your side of a debate.
we agree, we can't pick and choose. but you also can't substitue your opinion in place of facts. no matter what criteria you use, floyd fought shane and cotto when they were #1 at those weights. both shane and cotto had chances to fight floyd much earlier in their careers when floyd was with TR and both turned those opportunites down.
SInce you can't say no, your opinion becomes that fights were tougher because the fact is cotto and shane were considered #1 when floyd beat them. You can't just shape your opinions to suit your side of a debate.
we agree, we can't pick and choose. but you also can't substitue your opinion in place of facts. no matter what criteria you use, floyd fought shane and cotto when they were #1 at those weights. both shane and cotto had chances to fight floyd much earlier in their careers when floyd was with TR and both turned those opportunites down.
Comment