At least you weren't a sore loser Matthysse fan who didn't pay homage to Danny's win. You gave him props so there is hope.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who wins Pacquiao vs Broner
Collapse
-
-
This is like the fifth thread about the same ****** question. TS seems to finally woken up after last year and he came with the same nuthigging shtty threads. Pac is Top Rank, Broner is GBP. They dont work together. Stop the fantasies.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostAt least you weren't a sore loser Matthysse fan who didn't pay homage to Danny's win. You gave him props so there is hope.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by streetwaves View PostWell, exactly. The difference is that you're clearly a biased poster and I'm not. I gave Danny props for winning, while you would have discredited a Matthysse win and rooted for/predicted his next opponent would end his "hype job". That, in essence, is why I think your contribution to this forum is shyt.
And for the record, when clowns like you hype up a hype job, I always go the other way. Now who's the next fighter that you're going to give a 20% chance to win, Maidana?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostI'm biased to **** posters like you and real to real boxing fans. I like to stick it to clowns like you who give fighters basically no chance to win. My bad, you gave Danny 20% chance.
And for the record, when clowns like you hype up a hype job, I always go the other way. Now who's the next fighter that you're going to give a 20% chance to win, Maidana?
First of all, your comment about Maidana makes no sense. I gave Garcia a 20% chance to beat Lucas, which in your mind means I'm hyping up Lucas and shîtting on Danny. Now, you have probably seen my posts and know that I don't think much of Broner. So why would I hype him up? Or are you trying to say I will hype up Maidana, and inexplicably only give him a 20% chance to win?
As an aside, I always explain my predictions rather than just saying "he's going to get KTFO". Matthysse-Garcia was no exception. I just really didn't see a way Danny could win - all the more reason to give him props for doing so.
You're one ****** guy, man. You've been trolling these parts for a while now and I've seen enough to know what you are about. As I said, you'd have still called Lucas a hype job even if he KO'd Danny in the 2nd round - the same way you did after he beat Peterson, after you had honestly predicted Peterson to win (a defensible pick).Last edited by samouraï; 10-02-2013, 03:06 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by streetwaves View PostYour brain doesn't work very well. It's also getting kinda mad. Might want to drink some water and settle down, sweetheart.
First of all, your comment about Maidana makes no sense. I gave Garcia a 20% chance to beat Lucas, which in your mind means I'm hyping up Lucas and shîtting on Danny. Now, you have probably seen my posts and know that I don't think much of Broner. So why would I hype him up? Or are you trying to say I will hype up Maidana, and inexplicably only give him a 20% chance to win?
You're one ****** guy, man. You've been trolling these parts for a while now and I've seen enough to know what you are about.
Look, you gave what you thought was a safe answer. Danny beat Matthysse's ass. Destroyed your outlook on the whole fight AND your 20% theory. I absolutely could care less about what you think about Broner. And the rest of what you said you can shove it up your ass.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostOr are you saying? Lmao! Mad at what, you? Lmmfao. When you have to say it...that means you wish it.
Look, you gave what you thought was a safe answer. Danny beat Matthysse's ass. Destroyed your outlook on the whole fight AND your 20% theory. I absolutely could care less about what you think about Broner. And the rest of what you said you can shove it up your ass.
Comment
Comment