klit bros vs the marquez bros: better legacy
Collapse
-
Because other fighters arent brothers with very similar styles...All those fighters were ranked in the top 10 the same time as Vits so there was no reason not to fight them. Contenders need to fight other top contenders if they want legitimate recognition. Vits is not his brother and vice versa so that excuse carries no weight my friend. If it did than why should any fighter fight another after they've lost?
i saw peter get beatdown by vitali, and then a year or so later saw wlad do it...
haye is about the only guy i wanna see fight both brothers, just because he has a nice ko of chisora and he talks a good game..
if wlad beats up povetkin, do you wanna see povetkin-vitali
or did you wanna see adamek-wlad, after vitali beat him down,,,,,
Did you wanna see kirk johnson or danny williams fight wlad, after vitali dismantled them
i agree they are different fighters but the appeal for a fight greatly diminishes after one brother beats down a guy..
This isnt like if floyd beats someone, how would manny do,,, manny and floyd, or ward and froch have completely different styles, whereas the klits have some small differences but basically they control the fight with their size and jab, then land big shots and slowly break guys down...
in the early 2000s they were alittle bit more different as wlad had fully developed as a fighter, but over the last 10 years wlad has come into his own, and has learned to avoid some punches and control fights unlike the version of wlad that fought purritty etcComment
-
Comment
-
I'd say the Klitschkos. Nobody has even challenged them in years, whereas with Rafa and Juan they haven't had similar runs of dominance/Comment
-
-
Wlad is the champ. In spite of Vits paper title there can only be ONE world champion. I want to see contenders fighting the best contenders to get their legitimate shot at Wlad world title. Now because Vit can't/won't fight his brother this means he should be cleaning out everyone else in spite of whether Wlad has fought them or not. Had he done this he would have been more favorably looked upon like his brother.Because other fighters arent brothers with very similar styles...
i saw peter get beatdown by vitali, and then a year or so later saw wlad do it...
haye is about the only guy i wanna see fight both brothers, just because he has a nice ko of chisora and he talks a good game..
if wlad beats up povetkin, do you wanna see povetkin-vitali
or did you wanna see adamek-wlad, after vitali beat him down,,,,,
Did you wanna see kirk johnson or danny williams fight wlad, after vitali dismantled them
i agree they are different fighters but the appeal for a fight greatly diminishes after one brother beats down a guy..
This isnt like if floyd beats someone, how would manny do,,, manny and floyd, or ward and froch have completely different styles, whereas the klits have some small differences but basically they control the fight with their size and jab, then land big shots and slowly break guys down...
in the early 2000s they were alittle bit more different as wlad had fully developed as a fighter, but over the last 10 years wlad has come into his own, and has learned to avoid some punches and control fights unlike the version of wlad that fought purritty etcComment
-
Comment

Comment