Who will go down as a better fighter CARL FROCH OR CHAD DAWSON

[boliodogs]

Froch is always in top shape and always fights with 100% of his ability. He only has 2 losses and he reversed 1 of those losses. His loss to Ward was not as bad as Dawson's loss to Ward. Dawson is not consistant at all. He looks great one fight and average in his next fight. I think he is on the way out now as far as winning a title again goes. Froch would probably beat him if the fought now.

[dirty fingers]

Carl Froch.

[slimshandy69]

that's a wrap...

[boxingfeind]

I gotta go with froch.......

Dawson has

Adamek: A+ prime adamek, great win
Johnson: C johnson got robbed
Johnson2: B good win but johnson on the downhill slide
Tarver 1,2: B good name but not prime tarver
hopkins 1,2: A won lineal championship, hopkins is tough out for anyone

Froch
Taylor
pascal
abraham
dirrel
bute
kessler


Froch beat more prime fighters, dawson beat a great adamek, but johnson, tarver and hopkins had all past prime........

plus froch doesnt have any bad losses like dawson does... losing to kessler in a war in denmark and to andre ward and never getting blown out and ko'd in 90 seconds...

i gotta go with froch
dawson never had a huge signature dominant performance like froch had with bute

Dawsons win over Hopkins-regardless if he`s past his prime or not-takes a dump on Froch`s entire Resume.And Froch lost to Dirrell but got a gift decision,Jermaine Taylor and Kessler were past their prime when Froch fought them,And Arthur Abraham sux.


In my opinion,Dawson has the better resume because he has wins over a prime Hopkins whose an all time great,he has a win over a prime Adamek who is 2 division champ,And his win over Tarver aint bad either cause Tarver went on to beat a top cruiserweight in Danny Green.

[Æthelstan]

Obviously Carl Froch will go down as the better fighter.

[lefthook2daliva]

Do you really have an ***** tattoo?

[Earl-Hickey]

Froch by a mile imo.

every time dawson fights someone young he loses

[Larry the boss]

stopped soon as i read a grown man say Gayweather

[bojangles1987]

Dawsons win over Hopkins-regardless if he`s past his prime or not-takes a dump on Froch`s entire Resume.And Froch lost to Dirrell but got a gift decision,Jermaine Taylor and Kessler were past their prime when Froch fought them,And Arthur Abraham sux.


In my opinion,Dawson has the better resume because he has wins over a prime Hopkins whose an all time great,he has a win over a prime Adamek who is 2 division champ,And his win over Tarver aint bad either cause Tarver went on to beat a top cruiserweight in Danny Green.

Whaaaaaaaaat???

[#1Assassin]

froch has a great resume, i want to make it clear that im not bashing it in any way. the same thing goes for his career overall.

but to me dawsons resume is clearly a noth above frochs. not to mention the fact that dawson has on more than one occassion been the man, froch has never been more than the second best at any given time. no shame in that considering who is number one, but still.

the resume is still the main thing and to me dawsons is clearly superior. froch beat really good fighters, dawson beat legends. generally in more impressive fashion as well.