Victories at Catch-Weights and over Past Prime Opponents -Does it count?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 2Shotz
    Contender
    • Mar 2011
    • 471
    • 29
    • 3
    • 16,998

    #1

    Victories at Catch-Weights and over Past Prime Opponents -Does it count?

    I think the thread title says it. If you feast on past-prime opponents and at carefully negotiated catch-weights, should this tarnish your fight record? Or is a win a win?
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #2
    They all count. How much credit the winner gets depends on the fight.

    Comment

    • Sugar Adam Ali
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 27630
      • 970
      • 1,174
      • 82,827

      #3
      Originally posted by 2Shotz
      I think the thread title says it. If you feast on past-prime opponents and at carefully negotiated catch-weights, should this tarnish your fight record? Or is a win a win?
      Does fighter in question also have wins over guys that are prime...

      both manny and floyd have beaten past prime fighters, and CW fights...

      but both have great victories like genaro, corrales, MAB, etc..

      oscar fought an older chavez and pernell,,, CW with hopkins i do believe,,,

      SRL fought an older duran,,,,

      lennox fought an older tyson and holyfield,,,,

      I dont think it tarnishes the legacy...

      If you make a career of doing it, then yes it does tarnish the legacy some

      Comment

      • Derranged
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 46593
        • 2,126
        • 1,350
        • 162,628

        #4
        It depends on how much of an effect the cw appeared to have on the opponent and the condition of the fighter who was past prime.

        Comment

        • 2Shotz
          Contender
          • Mar 2011
          • 471
          • 29
          • 3
          • 16,998

          #5
          I've never enjoyed this style of match making. If the boxer with the leverage won, that "win" would feel tainted and not legit. However, it's always poetic when it backfires ala Foreman over Moorer. But most times it's a formerly great boxer being cherry picked for their marquee name/rep and that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

          Comment

          • Sugar Adam Ali
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2013
            • 27630
            • 970
            • 1,174
            • 82,827

            #6
            Originally posted by 2Shotz
            I've never enjoyed this style of match making. If the boxer with the leverage won, that "win" would feel tainted and not legit. However, it's always poetic when it backfires ala Foreman over Moorer. But most times it's a formerly great boxer being cherry picked for their marquee name/rep and that leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
            True but its the cycle of life in boxing....

            chavez was once young, and beat older guys, then got old and got beat up by a young oscar, then oscar got old and got beaten up by floyd and manny...

            I dont really mind guys fighting older fighters as long as they dont wait them out forever,,,, ruiz beat an old holyfield, but there wasnt a chance for him to fight a prime holyfield,,,

            I have a bigger problem with catchweights

            Comment

            • marvelousmatt
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Feb 2013
              • 901
              • 30
              • 61
              • 7,099

              #7
              Originally posted by 2Shotz
              I think the thread title says it. If you feast on past-prime opponents and at carefully negotiated catch-weights, should this tarnish your fight record? Or is a win a win?
              Does it count any less if you win ?
              Is there an asterick placed on a catch-weight win ?

              As much as I don't like them when they are at 141 lbs so no titles are on the line(Peterson and Matthyse) ...it is PRIZE FIGHTING and contracts get negotiated.If you don't like the terms,then don't sign for the fight.

              Comment

              • Luilun
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2010
                • 12457
                • 555
                • 94
                • 58,436

                #8
                Originally posted by 2Shotz
                I think the thread title says it. If you feast on past-prime opponents and at carefully negotiated catch-weights, should this tarnish your fight record? Or is a win a win?
                No ! Did Duran ask Leonard, Barkley ,Davey Moore for catch weights ? I he had he would have been laughed at back in the day

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP