If Floyd's next fight is Khan, it confirms he's ducking Pacman!

[richardt]

Whether its the robbery v bradley or the robbery v jmm, pac has lost 2 out of 3. And i dont care about other peoples money so for me pacbeatig a low ranked 140 lbr fighting for the first time at 147 and coming off a loss and also arguably losing 2 out of 3 does not warrant a match v floyd.

Pac did not lose to Bradley, everyone knows that. Pac beating anything warrants a match vs Floyd unless you can come up with 10 make that 1 fight in all of Boxing that would be considered bigger. I wont hold my breath waiting.

[Fetta]

Pac did not lose to Bradley, everyone knows that. Pac beating anything warrants a match vs Floyd unless you can come up with 10 make that 1 fight in all of Boxing that would be considered bigger. I wont hold my breath waiting.

I don't worry about others money so no PAC beating rios does not warrant a fight with Floyd. If he didn't lose to Bradley fine I think it. Was am robbery too but I also think he lost to JMM in that robbery so he still lost 2 of 3 no matter how you wanna try to spin it.

[JAB5239]

People still care about a Floyd-Pac fight? I gave up on that years ago. Even if it happens in the future its tarnished and has much less meaning.

[richardt]

I don't worry about others money so no PAC beating rios does not warrant a fight with Floyd. If he didn't lose to Bradley fine I think it. Was am robbery too but I also think he lost to JMM in that robbery so he still lost 2 of 3 no matter how you wanna try to spin it.

Spin it? Fighting anyone warrants a fight with Mayweather when the fighter generates world wide fame and attention. Other's money? You mean the money that would beat just about any fight of the last 10 years? If you think a Pac Floyd fight would not be one of the highest grossing fights of the last 10 years, you are full of the same crap that predicted that Canelo would be the new king which was a lot of crap.

[Fetta]

Spin it? Fighting anyone warrants a fight with Mayweather. Other's money? You mean the money that would beat just about any fight of the last 10 years? If you think a Pac Floyd fight would not be one of the highest grossing fights of all time, you are full of the same crap that predicted that Canelo would be the new king which was a lot of crap.

Yeah that money! Unlike you I don't worry about others accounts. I worry about mine. Let it be the highest grossing fight of all time! The day after my account will be the same

Big deal I choose Canelo to win? He didn't so oh well. It's a sport not life or death.

[richardt]

Yeah that money! Unlike you I don't worry about others accounts. I worry about mine. Let it be the highest grossing fight of all time! The day after my account will be the same.

Well, your bank account isn't a part of the movers and shakers but that doesn't change the fact that as long as Pac stays winning, he is half of the equation of one of if not the richest fight in history.

[Fetta]

Well, your bank account isn't a part of the movers and shakers but that doesn't change the fact that as long as Pac stays winning, he is half of the equation of one of if not the richest fight in history.

Sadly no it isn't but I do agree that If PAC keeps wining I have no problem. I wanna see it just to end this debate, but after beating rios no.

[richardt]

Sadly no it isn't but I do agree that If PAC keeps wining I have no problem. I wanna see it just to end this debate, but after beating rios no.

It is not about debates, it is about fights that the Boxing public want to see, fights that draw in casual fans and convert many into serious fans, fights the sport uses to launch and maintain Boxing relevance at the high levels like Floyd vs Canelo. Its about showcasing skills and or pitched battles with drama. Debates are specs of practically nothing in the grand scheme of the sport.