? For Paquiao fan's

[machotime]

In the first place kid, it didn't happen.

Why speculate on something which won't happen.

Use your common sense.

JMM doesn't have the power to hurt PAC. In fact out of the 3 Mexican greats, he's the one with the least power.

so why would you argue on having PAC down 3 times?

That's both funny.

And a complete sign that you're just whining.

JMM got knocked down 3 times but then went on to school pacman, but you gies say that Pacman "destroyed" JMM, and the judges scored it wrong". But if it was the other way around, you would have said that Pacman was robbed. YOu gies are so biased.

[dep_violator]

why you guys allways have to start name calling?? instead of just giving your opinions?? For reals Grow up!

It's not an opinion kid. It's a fact.

PAC demolishes Mexican greats and beats them up so bad, even King Kong will look better after PAC's done with them.

Morales could have suffered permanent physical damage, and you all saw what PAC does to his opponents.

Greatness is measured by the results and by the way he has achieved it.

PAC started at 108 and everytime he wins he always calls out the guy above him.

From 108 to 130... that's about 6-7 weight divisions.

And along the way, he has carved a bloody path of hapless opponents, most of which are Mexicans.

He has not backed off from any opponent and no one can quetion his credibility.

That fact that you're going into this what-ifs which has no possibility of happening just proves you're just sour-graping and whining.

[tracylee]

In the first place kid, it didn't happen.

Why speculate on something which won't happen.

Use your common sense.

JMM doesn't have the power to hurt PAC. In fact out of the 3 Mexican greats, he's the one with the least power.

so why would you argue on having PAC down 3 times?

That's both funny.

And a complete sign that you're just whining.

1st, it was a hypothetical question, which is fair.
2nd, I'm not a kid exactly, 36, matter of fact.
3rd, your refusal to answer and try to divert the issue is a complete sign of your denial. I just thought you might back some of it up...I was wrong. No problem.

[dep_violator]

JMM got knocked down 3 times but then went on to school pacman, but you gies say that Pacman "destroyed" JMM, and the judges scored it wrong". But if it was the other way around, you would have said that Pacman was robbed. YOu gies are so biased.

School? How? I thought you know your boxing history? lol!

PAC was cheated of that fight.

You want evidence?

One of the judges miscored his card and called the wrong points on PAC.

It's a simple matter of evidence which the judge has admitted to his mistake.

It's not even debatable kid.

And I thought you know you boxing.

Obviously... you don't.

[dep_violator]

1st, it was a hypothetical question, which is fair.
2nd, I'm not a kid exactly, 36, matter of fact.
3rd, your refusal to answer and try to divert the issue is a complete sign of your denial. I just thought you might back some of it up...I was wrong. No problem.

ANd why would I refute an argument which haven't happened and has no remote possibility of happening? lol!

that's just pure common sense.

A useless argument which has no weight need not be refuted.

It refutes itself. lol!

Better learn to use common sense kid.

[machotime]

School? How? I thought you know your boxing history? lol!

PAC was cheated of that fight.

You want evidence?

One of the judges miscored his card and called the wrong points on PAC.

It's a simple matter of evidence which the judge has admitted to his mistake.

It's not even debatable kid.

And I thought you know you boxing.

Obviously... you don't.

Ok let me rephrase, JMM outsmarted and outboxed pacman for the majority of the fight. You are ignoring a legit question, but your biasedness does not allow you to admit that the better fighter on that night was JMM.

[domzkidot]

yes i would, u can box all day but not get 3 kd's in one round

[tracylee]

ANd why would I refute an argument which haven't happened and has no remote possibility of happening? lol!

that's just pure common sense.

A useless argument which has no weight need not be refuted.

It refutes itself. lol!

Better learn to use common sense kid.

wow, thats amazing. all you had to do was answer yes or no. lol, thats funny as hell. Common sense is my middle name, kid.

[domzkidot]

and oh tracy lee may i ask which fighter do you consider legends

[tracylee]

and oh tracy lee may i ask which fighter do you consider legends

wait wait wait, did you answer that you'd give the win to marquez for knocking manny down 3 times in the 1st rd? I'm just trying to keep it straight. Did you?