Vitali's mythical poor resume pt 2

[Boxing Goat]

Lol why do you feel you have to make up stories to improve Vitalis resume? Not all of those fighters were top 10 then or since.

Actually, they are and/or were. Do some research before you start talking out of your backside.

[ИATAS]

Vitali's resume is terrible. Sam Peter is by far his best win. That says a lot.

I always felt he was the best Klit but Wlad does have the better wins (chris byrd for example ).

[JAB5239]

Vitali's resume is not weak by any stretch. He may not have fought other all time greats or HOF'rs aside from Lewis but it doesn't matter because they were washed up by the time he was reaching his pinacle. That's what these morons don't want to understand. A win over ancient Tyson and Holyfield would have been possible but what is the point?

Top ten Ring opponents:
In case anyone was wondering.

1)Hide
2)Byrd
3)Kirk Johnson
4)Lewis
5)Sanders
6)Williams
7)Peter
8)Gomez
9)Arreola
10)Solis
11)Adamek
12)Chisora

His resume is very weak and theres no way around that. You have to ask yourself what his best wins did before fighting him and what they did after fighting him, and the fact is the overwhelming majority did very little to nothing.

And are you really telling me 1999, a year all three were ranked would have been a terrible year to fight Tyson or Holyfields? What about all the rest of the ranked fighters I pointed out him missing?

[Derranged]

If you want to know just how special Vitali was and is, just watch his fight against Lewis. That fight was taken on 2 weeks notice and until this day I think he would have KO'd Lewis had that fight continued.

If that fight continued Vitali's eye might have been ruined for life.

What a freak cut that was, the punch caught his eye on a weird angle.

14:30

[JAB5239]

Actually, they are and/or were. Do some research before you start talking out of your backside.

Herbie Hide and Danny Williams weren't.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2004

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_1999

[LacedUp]

Actually, they are and/or were. Do some research before you start talking out of your backside.

Wow dude. Actually, I did.

Hide, Williams, Solis and Chisora weren't in the top 10 when Vitali fought them. That's what counts. Otherwise, you forgot about Briggs as well. He used to be a solid top 10'er

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2011

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2004

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_1999

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2012

It seems like you should do some research on it

[JAB5239]

Wow dude. Actually, I did.

Hide, Williams, Solis and Chisora weren't in the top 10 when Vitali fought them. That's what counts. Otherwise, you forgot about Briggs as well. He used to be a solid top 10'er

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2011

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2004

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_1999

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2012

It seems like you should do some research on it

He's got no answers, only guesswork and assumptions. Next he'll say they were ranked by the WBO or WBC so it makes it ok. Why not the WFF, WBF or IBC than?

[Grimmer]

Does Vitali have a top 50 heavyweight of all time on his resume?

Just one?

No?

How can he be an ATG himself then?

[JAB5239]

Does Vitali have a top 50 heavyweight of all time on his resume?

Just one?

No?

How can he be an ATG himself then?

As the champion (for 1 defense) he don't fight the number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10th ranked fighter...he fought Danny Williams. Of those 10 fighters he only ever fought 2 of them and quit in one of those fights. Since that time he has never fought the next highest contender after himself. How can he be called an ATG?

[The Big Dunn]

did this really need a part 2? Vitali's resume is ****. didn't part 1 already confirm this?