Does JMM-Bradley Deserve To Be PPV?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Gambler1981
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 25961
    • 521
    • 774
    • 49,039

    #41
    I will say yea it does because I think it can make money and it is kind of a heat check on JMM to see where he is at coming off that win.

    I don't think it will be huge but enough to make everyone involved a few dollars.

    It is a quality fight between top end guys, although they rest of the card is not shaping up well so that marks down the event but I still say that is a decent ppv main event.

    Comment

    • 2120
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2006
      • 1723
      • 111
      • 383
      • 14,349

      #42
      Originally posted by ELPacman
      I ain't paying to watch this. Your gonna see who was the star vs JMM and Bradley after the dismal purchases it receives. 1 guy who robbed Pac of victory and another guy that took 4 tries to get a KO win on Pac and say, yeah, I'm done fighting him now. Not sure what to make of these two.
      how many tries does pac need to get a knockout win over Marquez???

      Apparently more than Marquez

      Comment

      • PAC-BOY
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 55380
        • 4,125
        • 5,352
        • 157,380

        #43
        Id buy it. And will. If Floyd as boring as he is on PPV...These two guys here deserve it to.

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #44
          I think this PPV will be about 40 to 60 bones..I also believe it will be worth it,I have no issue with paying for this fight right here..

          Comment

          • Pigeons
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 14750
            • 1,211
            • 714
            • 37,430

            #45
            JMM-Bradley, yes I will watch it at a bar. Pacquiao-Rios, no I will stream it.

            Comment

            • bigcursedawg
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2010
              • 2710
              • 88
              • 16
              • 9,036

              #46
              Bradley Marquez is a great fight but the undercard is ****.

              Comment

              • MatchMaker215
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2006
                • 1647
                • 45
                • 148
                • 15,478

                #47
                Is it 70??

                Comment

                • Beater_of_ass
                  male ass that is
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 7172
                  • 281
                  • 144
                  • 13,666

                  #48
                  Originally posted by 2120
                  how many tries does pac need to get a knockout win over Marquez???

                  Apparently more than Marquez
                  It took Marquez 4 times to win... he can say he got robbed all he wants it's what the record says. Look at Floyd, he lost to Castillo but it's not that way in the books. He's a b*tch and nothing more, it took nearly 50 rounds and steroids coming out of his ass to do it, FACT. He still hasn't even gotten tested for the Bradley fight and the only other fight we know he had mandatory Olympic testing against Floyd the guy looked like a ****ing bum who would struggle with Katsidis, Diaz and lose to Chris John... oh damn, it IS that guy. I'm not even a Manny fan btw so don't even start with that ****, the guy is a dirty ****ing cheat period. Sorry for my rant I just lost all respect for that guy.

                  As for the topic, it shouldn't be but neither should Pac/Rios IMO. GBP did this last card right, a solid undercard and a "casual fan" main event. By that I mean people thought Canelo had a chance (not me.)

                  Comment

                  • sugarsmosley
                    sugarsmosley
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 7393
                    • 467
                    • 436
                    • 14,323

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Money Team.
                    If anything Rios and Pac shouldnt be ppv
                    Pacquiao vs. Chop chop Corley would be a PPV still.

                    Comment

                    • pacmanis1
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 2218
                      • 137
                      • 108
                      • 16,982

                      #50
                      Originally posted by FrankieClutch
                      Lol yep. So are all PPV's going to be $70 from now on?? I remember a few years back there were PPV fights for like $24.99 (I wish i could remember the exact fights, but only the prices stuck with me).
                      I vote no just because I hate the ppv model and find boxing to be the greediest sport ever. It's bad enough that I have to pay an extra 25$ just to have Showtime and HBO. I can watch football every Sunday on network tv and I wish boxing was the same way. I know I'm in the minority here but that's just my opinion. Has nothing to do with the fighters involved.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP