Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does JMM-Bradley Deserve To Be PPV?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I will say yea it does because I think it can make money and it is kind of a heat check on JMM to see where he is at coming off that win.

    I don't think it will be huge but enough to make everyone involved a few dollars.

    It is a quality fight between top end guys, although they rest of the card is not shaping up well so that marks down the event but I still say that is a decent ppv main event.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by ELPacman View Post
      I ain't paying to watch this. Your gonna see who was the star vs JMM and Bradley after the dismal purchases it receives. 1 guy who robbed Pac of victory and another guy that took 4 tries to get a KO win on Pac and say, yeah, I'm done fighting him now. Not sure what to make of these two.
      how many tries does pac need to get a knockout win over Marquez???

      Apparently more than Marquez

      Comment


      • #43
        Id buy it. And will. If Floyd as boring as he is on PPV...These two guys here deserve it to.

        Comment


        • #44
          I think this PPV will be about 40 to 60 bones..I also believe it will be worth it,I have no issue with paying for this fight right here..

          Comment


          • #45
            JMM-Bradley, yes I will watch it at a bar. Pacquiao-Rios, no I will stream it.

            Comment


            • #46
              Bradley Marquez is a great fight but the undercard is ****.

              Comment


              • #47
                Is it 70??

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by 2120 View Post
                  how many tries does pac need to get a knockout win over Marquez???

                  Apparently more than Marquez
                  It took Marquez 4 times to win... he can say he got robbed all he wants it's what the record says. Look at Floyd, he lost to Castillo but it's not that way in the books. He's a b*tch and nothing more, it took nearly 50 rounds and steroids coming out of his ass to do it, FACT. He still hasn't even gotten tested for the Bradley fight and the only other fight we know he had mandatory Olympic testing against Floyd the guy looked like a ****ing bum who would struggle with Katsidis, Diaz and lose to Chris John... oh damn, it IS that guy. I'm not even a Manny fan btw so don't even start with that ****, the guy is a dirty ****ing cheat period. Sorry for my rant I just lost all respect for that guy.

                  As for the topic, it shouldn't be but neither should Pac/Rios IMO. GBP did this last card right, a solid undercard and a "casual fan" main event. By that I mean people thought Canelo had a chance (not me.)

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Money Team. View Post
                    If anything Rios and Pac shouldnt be ppv
                    Pacquiao vs. Chop chop Corley would be a PPV still.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by FrankieClutch View Post
                      Lol yep. So are all PPV's going to be $70 from now on?? I remember a few years back there were PPV fights for like $24.99 (I wish i could remember the exact fights, but only the prices stuck with me).
                      I vote no just because I hate the ppv model and find boxing to be the greediest sport ever. It's bad enough that I have to pay an extra 25$ just to have Showtime and HBO. I can watch football every Sunday on network tv and I wish boxing was the same way. I know I'm in the minority here but that's just my opinion. Has nothing to do with the fighters involved.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP