Mayweather is better than Sweet Pea

[-PBP-]

They are both in the same tier. Who you have higher is a matter of personal preference.

Your not going to a convince a Floyd die hard that Pea was higher and your not going to convince a throwback die hard that Pea is higher.

[UTEP]

Mayweather is better than Sweet Pea. Anyone agree?

[illmaticfighter]

You're flip flopping, Hattons best accomplishments and performances were at 140. Hatton was not a better fighter at 147, that's all I'm saying, if you don't agree I don't care, it doesn't change it. The fight was at 147 to make the fight possible, I understand that, but please, at least admit Hatton was at his best at 140 jesus.

i never said he was a better fighter at 147 no one is floyd tried to fight him there but that's another issue, but does that mean floyd fought a blown up ww who ****** at 47 like your trying to claim?


i'm not flip flopping at all my first post was simple you're discrediting floyd win over hatton because he moved up one division when floyd has moved up 5 divisions, so since you think castillo beat floyd i guess i'm gonna say floyd wasn't a better fighter at 135 which is why he lost.

[Humean]

Very close but Mayweather just edges it for me. Beating Canelo probably pushes him ahead, he dominated a quality opponent who was 15 pounds heavier, this is supposed to be 2013 not 1943.

[lfc19titles]

no, also floyd and one of the goat? you see, fans need to understand, just because a fighter looks good against a less talented guys like guerrero or canelo, does not mean he is the great ffs, it shows he is better than them

look at floyds resume, you can say what you want

floyd ducked a prime kostya and mosley, they had his number, he ducked them to avoid losing, he thought corrales would be easier later on, it backfired, he lost but got the decision

then onto his ww, again, there was a prime cotto, margo and williams to really cement his resume, what did floyd do? he freaking retired to duck them! why do people ignore the fact during floyds prime, he ducked the best guys and only came back when they lost and were worn out!

then the 100 excuses to duck pac, he will never go down as one of the goat, because frankly, his resume is average, there are 50 fighters easy with better resumes in history, EASY

[Vasyl’s dad]

Quote:

Originally Posted by CatchweightKing

Pretty easy to go strong at 36 when you fight once a year for the past 7 years.



Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I love seeing you make excuses everyday

Excuse for what? I speak the truth. The less you fight, the less damage you take thus prolonging your career. Or do you think George Foreman wins a title in his forties without taking a decade off?


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[The Big Dunn]

no, also floyd and one of the goat? you see, fans need to understand, just because a fighter looks good against a less talented guys like guerrero or canelo, does not mean he is the great ffs, it shows he is better than them

look at floyds resume, you can say what you want

floyd ducked a prime kostya and mosley, they had his number, he ducked them to avoid losing, he thought corrales would be easier later on, it backfired, he lost but got the decision

then onto his ww, again, there was a prime cotto, margo and williams to really cement his resume, what did floyd do? he freaking retired to duck them! why do people ignore the fact during floyds prime, he ducked the best guys and only came back when they lost and were worn out!

then the 100 excuses to duck pac, he will never go down as one of the goat, because frankly, his resume is average, there are 50 fighters easy with better resumes in history, EASY

give it a rest dude. people know the real reasons the fights didn't happen. you can't change the truth no matter what you do.feel free to love manny all you want.

floyd is far superior to everyone in his generation. Time for a new debate.

[The Big Dunn]

Excuse for what? I speak the truth. The less you fight, the less damage you take thus prolonging your career. Or do you think George Foreman wins a title in his forties without taking a decade off?


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

NO the better your defense, the less damage you take and it prolongs your career.

[Doctor_Tenma]

As Mak said "No not really". What really brings these two together is they are two of the most versatile fighters ever, they were all around great, it's a very old topic though. They'll forever be attached to one another in the IQ, versatility and talent department department. Resume wise I give Whitaker the edge still.

[Humean]

no, also floyd and one of the goat? you see, fans need to understand, just because a fighter looks good against a less talented guys like guerrero or canelo, does not mean he is the great ffs, it shows he is better than them

look at floyds resume, you can say what you want

floyd ducked a prime kostya and mosley, they had his number, he ducked them to avoid losing, he thought corrales would be easier later on, it backfired, he lost but got the decision

then onto his ww, again, there was a prime cotto, margo and williams to really cement his resume, what did floyd do? he freaking retired to duck them! why do people ignore the fact during floyds prime, he ducked the best guys and only came back when they lost and were worn out!

then the 100 excuses to duck pac, he will never go down as one of the goat, because frankly, his resume is average, there are 50 fighters easy with better resumes in history, EASY

1. Canelo is very talented and was 15 pounds heavier.

2. You are referring to Castillo not Corrales and Castillo I was close and he didn't fight Castillo 'later on' in the sense of being past his best.

3. If you seriously believe that Mayweather after having fought Hernandez, Chavez, Castllo twice, Corrales, Judah, De La Hoya and Hatton, looked at Cotto, Margarito and Williams and decided to retire then you need your head examined. All the more so when he came back and fought Marquez, Mosley, Cotto and Canelo!

4. Resume isn't everything in judging a fighters greatness.

5. I need my head examined for even bothering to reply to you.