Comments Thread For: Beltran: Burns Protected as Investment, Referee Terrible

[LAPete]

Are you a f**king ******?

Joe - don't waste your time with this clown. If you have read any of his past posts you will clearly see he has no clue.

[Alpha & Omega]

I had heard so many good things about Burns so I was anxious to watch him in action. Wow was I disappointed. He is the best Scotland has to offer? He lost that fight 100%. Beltran is a B level fighter and he won that match relatively easily. Burns needs to stay away from any of the top guys in that division def.

[ragingbull1]

You just know when Jim Watt says the home-fighter lost then the home-fighter definitely lost, and lost by a very very wide margin! Anyone watching the fight saw Beltran won, he dominated every round! Politics hey..... if only we had someone that could be held accountable!!?? Anyway, Beltran..... U won that belt, you're the champ!!

[LAFIRPO]

You just know when Jim Watt says the home-fighter lost then the home-fighter definitely lost, and lost by a very very wide margin! Anyone watching the fight saw Beltran won, he dominated every round! Politics hey..... if only we had someone that could be held accountable!!?? Anyway, Beltran..... U won that belt, you're the champ!!

Haha, I didn't see this fight, but I remember seeing a couple of fights that Jim Watt announced, and I couldn't believe how incredibly biased and unprofessional Jim Watt was. I've never seen or heard someone be so blatantly biased.

[PACnPBFsuck]

Riddle me this, in your honest opinion do you believe Phil Edwards should still be the third man in the ring after these two very recent shėtty incidents of officiating? 1. Chisora v Malik 2. Burns v Beltran. Both high profile here in the uk.

Not until he proves himself competent enough to do high profile fights over there, if we're mentioning a refs name more than either boxer, then the ref is doing a bad job.