I think it's ridiculous to have Canelo on a p4p list when his best and only win over someone his size is a questionable decision. Broner and Guerrero at least have legit wins for titles in multiple weight classes, but no way either belongs in the top 10 p4p. Or even top 25 imo.
I think it's ridiculous to have Canelo on a p4p list when his best and only win over someone his size is a questionable decision. Broner and Guerrero at least have legit wins for titles in multiple weight classes, but no way either belongs in the top 10 p4p. Or even top 25 imo.
It was questionable? >__>... He beat what was considered the top 154 guy thats gotta count for much more than beating Malignaggi and Berto lol. Now that shouldnt put him in the p4p but he'd be breaking close with another solid win imo.
Anyway yeah there's always some random picks in the p4p that make you just wtf at the world
For me pound for pound means..if you were in another weight class you would dominate.. It should be a list for guys with serious skills. If your a surpreme boxing talent..IE..u know who.. you can use that skill and any weight class.. if you are a big guy with power, im not sure that pound for pound worthy because if we placed your 20 pounds over your best weight you won't have those advantages.. Maybe I don't make sense
Exactly. Gurrero was never truly seem as p4p by any logical real boxing fan. Some moron who watches once a year might think gurrero is p4p because ring conveniently put him there for the Floyd fight.
Comment