How would you rate this HW era?
Collapse
-
-
'Giving Holyfield a fight' doesn't mean Foreman would beat all HW's of today. Silly line of reasoning, to say the least.Comment
-
I never said Toney was a great heavyweight. He wasn't, not even close.
Yet he was winning against heavyweights better than the crap today. What does that say about today's heavyweight division?Comment
-
So, do you exclusively debate by exaggerating what people said and leaving out key parts of their posts? I made it clear that old Foreman would not beat Wlad, and I don't know what Vitali has left so that's a question. He could and probably would beat everyone else though. Giving Holyfield a fight is better than most these average or worse fighters would do, and old Foreman has actual wins I can point to that are better fighters than most today.Comment
-
-
-
its obvious in this thread that alot of posters have no idea about boxing except for a few years,,,
the 50's was dreadful,,, or how about the era of jack dempesy when dempsey would never defend vs a negro... or how about the jack johnson era,,,, those were horrible eras for different reasons,, mainly racism,,,
At least today everyone has a fair shake,,
Some of you should do some reading before you spout off that this is the worst era ever,,, boxing has a deep history,, learn itComment
Comment