Why was trout a very good fighter before Canelo and the became overrated as soon.....
Collapse
-
-
Man Mayweather Trout would have been billed Nyquil. Trouts style blows its decent but thqts it.Comment
-
Canelo BARELY won, and not "barely" as in it was so close he deserved a razor thin decision... BARELY as in, he could have won much more convincingly if he wasn't missing a key element to his game, stamina...
Trout is top 10, Canelo top 5 (in head to head fights)Comment
-
Trout is a solid fighter. Always was and still is a terrific fighter. Canelo, in my opinion, is still in the same league as Trout. Both of them have much to work on, but they both have tremendous amounts of potential in them.Comment
-
It bothers me that people are pretending that Canelo dominated Trout and it bothers me that people are pretending that Trout dominated Cotto.Comment
-
Trout was a good fighter with an awkward style. He was never a great fighter. The only reason Canelo gets any hate on the fight outside of the obvious, is that he did not look good at all in it. He looked winded early, and didn't have much output on top of it. Overall it was a good win, but not a good looking win.Comment
-
Trout was a good fighter with an awkward style. He was never a great fighter. The only reason Canelo gets any hate on the fight outside of the obvious, is that he did not look good at all in it. He looked winded early, and didn't have much output on top of it. Overall it was a good win, but not a good looking win.Comment
-
That was Canelo's toughest challenge to date since he didn't face anybody near Trout. Trout is still a solid fighter and Canelo didn't run away with the thing. Trout is not elite but I wouldn't be surprised that he would win another titleComment
-
Comment
Comment