Dwyer is not a racist imo

[Hougigo]

He always picks the underdog because he's looking for value

[Curtiz]

He cant be racist. He actually put out a video picking Guerrero over Floyd.

???????????????? where

& dont say look

[TheMexHurricane]

But no, I don't think he's racist.

johnm is a jeanyus!

[johnm is...]

He always picks the underdog because he's looking for value

That's part of the brilliance of his plan.

He picks the guy facing Wlad to beat Wlad every time. Imagine the youtube uproar when someone does beat him. The 15 times he's been wrong will be long forgotten, and he'll look like a genius because he finally. got. it. right.

Then we can be on the lookout for "Dwyers book of the painfully obvious" volume 2.

[johnm is...]

It really seems like I hate Dwyer. I don't, lol. I'm ain't even mad at him. Get your money, big fella.

He puts his opinion out there, and that's cool. He stands by what he says. Also cool. But I'm telling you right now, based on a "units won/units loss" standpoint, he's break even at best.

I know of 10 or so guys that are better (myself included, toot toot). And another 3 or so on this forum who I would turn to for an opinion before him.

[Salardo]

Dwyer knows exactly what people want to hear. He said Tarver and Hopkins can beat Wladimir Klitschko. He said Bradley vs Pacquiao was not a robbery.
He only says what helps his agenda, he never told the truth if it didn't fit his narrative.

[Weebler I]

And he also picked Paulie over Broner so whats your point?

lol yeah, he says he had Paulie up by 6 rounds by the 7th or something like that and he felt ripped off by the decision.

He always picks the underdog because he's looking for value

that's the other thing people don't understand with Dwyer, he's not coming from a boxing angle for the most part, he's coming from a ******** standpoint so he's trying to spot upsets. His approach reminds me of Mathed the poster on here.

[Outwest Exp 355]

???????????????? where

& dont say look

I think this is it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTTU4qRbFRk

[johnm is...]

I watched the Fonfara vs Campillo video. He went on and on about combination punchers. Sugar ray Leonard for one. Then on about wiley veterans who are counter punchers, like Hopkins.

And finally got around to picking Campillo to win. I have zero idea what any of those guys have to do with one another.

[Hougigo]

That's part of the brilliance of his plan.

He picks the guy facing Wlad to beat Wlad every time. Imagine the youtube uproar when someone does beat him. The 15 times he's been wrong will be long forgotten, and he'll look like a genius because he finally. got. it. right.

Then we can be on the lookout for "Dwyers book of the painfully obvious" volume 2.

lol yeah, he says he had Paulie up by 6 rounds by the 7th or something like that and he felt ripped off by the decision.



that's the other thing people don't understand with Dwyer, he's not coming from a boxing angle for the most part, he's coming from a ******** standpoint so he's trying to spot upsets. His approach reminds me of Mathed the poster on here.

This is how I see Dwyer.... he looks for something he likes then finds every reason he can to validate a wager on them.
I remember in Wlad/Tony 2, he said Tony made it 11 rounds, gave Wlad a lot of problems, he was a southpaw and he'll do it again.... got KO'd in 6 rounds.
I think he was on Tony against Price both times and look what happened then?

He might be losing more than winning SU, but his profit is probably still good. He always bets on the underdog and comes out on top sometimes