... I feel sorry for this poor guy, because he's pretty much that least-sellable commodity in boxing: the heavyweight without any pop.
I intensely admire (maybe put a "d" on that as he's clearly deteriorating as a boxer at top level these days) his skills, but how much more would he be regarded if he could ****?
I always think he's good for purists if he was put on a boxing card with some high-octane boxers for contrast, but as a spectacle you know what you're going to get every time: unless he loses, a points win over twelve rounds.
I know it's somewhat frowned up these days to crave a KO, but it has to be acknowledged that the knock is an important element of boxing's appeal - especially with the layman, and especially at heavyweight.
So, it's perhaps an incredibly old question, but... If Byrd could ****, how much more would you like him?
I intensely admire (maybe put a "d" on that as he's clearly deteriorating as a boxer at top level these days) his skills, but how much more would he be regarded if he could ****?
I always think he's good for purists if he was put on a boxing card with some high-octane boxers for contrast, but as a spectacle you know what you're going to get every time: unless he loses, a points win over twelve rounds.
I know it's somewhat frowned up these days to crave a KO, but it has to be acknowledged that the knock is an important element of boxing's appeal - especially with the layman, and especially at heavyweight.
So, it's perhaps an incredibly old question, but... If Byrd could ****, how much more would you like him?
.
Comment