Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman Advises Amir Khan To Stay Away From 147

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Philadel

WTF is this bum ass dude taking about now?....AK would stamp this dude up

Hey bro, you playing right??

Nah bro, he really believes the **** that he says.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[slicksouthpaw16]

Khan doesn't have any welterweight wins so who cares? Who the *** is Chaves? Who cares? Thurman is a nobody who hasn't beaten anybody. Tell me when he stops fighting for co-main event money and we'll talk

Btw...why have you sigged that quote?

Who would you take in Kahn vs Thurman at 147? (I'm about 96% sure what you will say). When comparing fighters in a potential match up, it's irrelevant to bring up who one fighter has beat in lower weight classes. Like seriously, what does beating the likes of Mcklousky or even Maidana at 140 has to do with Thurman? Who has fought as high as 154. Id take Chaves over anyone Kahn has beaten.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Who would you take in Kahn vs Thurman at 147? (I'm about 96% sure what you will say). When comparing fighters in a potential match up, it's irrelevant to bring up who one fighter has beat in lower weight classes. Like seriously, what does beating the likes of Mcklousky or even Maidana at 140 has to do with Thurman? Who has fought as high as 154. Id take Chaves over anyone Kahn has beaten.

It has to do with how viable the fight is. Thurman is not on Khan's radar because he hasn't fought anyone. Khan has no reason to fight a guy who's fighting on undercards.

I would take Khan, he's the better boxer by quite some margin from what I've seen. Thurman would have a punchers chance I guess.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by slicksouthpaw16

Who would you take in Kahn vs Thurman at 147? (I'm about 96% sure what you will say). When comparing fighters in a potential match up, it's irrelevant to bring up who one fighter has beat in lower weight classes. Like seriously, what does beating the likes of Mcklousky or even Maidana at 140 has to do with Thurman? Who has fought as high as 154. Id take Chaves over anyone Kahn has beaten.

It has to do with how viable the fight is. Thurman is not on Khan's radar because he hasn't fought anyone. Khan has no reason to fight a guy who's fighting on undercards.

I would take Khan, he's the better boxer by quite some margin from what I've seen. Thurman would have a punchers chance I guess.

Alexander was just on an undercard.

I like Khan he's hardly better boxer. When you struggle vs Diaz... yea.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Alexander was just on an undercard.

I like Khan he's hardly better boxer. When you struggle vs Diaz... yea.

Alexander has been on several main events though. He has a belt. He's actually fought and beaten people worth a ****. Thurman does not tick any of these boxes.

Khan is quite clearly a better boxer. He would most likely make Thurman look like a club fighter in the middle of the ring. His only danger would be to get careless which he obviously has a tendency to do.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by .:: JSFD26 ::.

Alexander was just on an undercard.

I like Khan he's hardly better boxer. When you struggle vs Diaz... yea.

Alexander has been on several main events though. He has a belt. He's actually fought and beaten people worth a ****. Thurman does not tick any of these boxes.

Khan is quite clearly a better boxer. He would most likely make Thurman look like a club fighter in the middle of the ring. His only danger would be to get careless which he obviously has a tendency to do.

And it happens quite often. The margin for error is small when you face someone like Thurman.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Lets put it this way, when/if you are depending on Khan to be flawless then you're better off just betting on the other guy and make yourself some extra money.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[sicko]

Thurman would send Khan into retirement!

[Tonyu]

Khan doesn't have any welterweight wins so who cares? Who the *** is Chaves? Who cares? Thurman is a nobody who hasn't beaten anybody. Tell me when he stops fighting for co-main event money and we'll talk

Btw...why have you sigged that quote?

Well, well Dirk Diggler UK - Thurman has beaten Zavek ex world champ, beat Quintana who held a world title and challenged Berto for the title recently and Chavez the number 1 contender with record of 20 -0 (18ko) but you live in your own little world not knowing who these fighters are- just because you don't know who they makes you nieve - Khans last fight did you see it, that should answer all questions. Thurman is a special talent and for you to mock him is pathetic.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Well, well Dirk Diggler UK - Thurman has beaten Zavek ex world champ, beat Quintana who held a world title and challenged Berto for the title recently and Chavez the number 1 contender with record of 20 -0 (18ko) but you live in your own little world not knowing who these fighters are- just because you don't know who they makes you nieve - Khans last fight did you see it, that should answer all questions. Thurman is a special talent and for you to mock him is pathetic.

He's beaten fringe contenders and gatekeepers. AKA he's beaten nobody.