Tweet
I assure you Macklin is not a better fighter than Stevens, GGG IS not better in every department, to me power is equal with Stevens being more explosive, I also believe Stevens has the faster hands, GGG puts his punches/combos together better. Also Stevens does get wild but he keeps his chin tucked all the time, just look @ the fight last night, during all the exchanges his chin was tucked. Also we don't know who stamina is better. Stevens fight before this was 10 rounder vs a guy whom always come to fight and has some type of pressure. I believe GGG last fight that went past the midway point was vs Ouma. So I say their both equal in that department Yes Stevens has 3 loses all @ super middle and light heavy, those guys were all bigger than him except Brinkley. Macklin had what 4 loses going in vs GGG, and has been KO twice before he met GGG. The fact that guys are saying Stevens is a bum/ or doesn't deserve the payday vs GGG, but yet GGG deserves to fight Mayweather "Yes Posters on here has said and continues to say that", smh. Stevens was a decorated amateur as well as well as golden gloves champ. Though not as deep as GGG, he was a hot prospect turning pro, and was until he didn't stay disciplined with his weight, and ventured in those higher weights were all his loses are. Now I'm not saying he would beat GGG, " I don't Know" but Stevenson is by far a serious more dangerous challenge/challenger, than the likes of Macklin, Ishida, Proska, & Rosado. Also for GGG to be so elite and have such a deep amateur pedigree. He gets hit way too much. Only guys whom didn't really land any leather was Macklin & Ishida whom was scared before they even entered the ring. Plus none of those guys I mentioned had the power to test GGG. Yes GGG gets hit way too much. Don't want to hear he's improved, no his competition has been made to order. Nevertheless GGG IS the real deal, just not invincible
Comment